William Martin v. Healthy Halo Insurance Services Inc.
| William Martin |
| Healthy Halo Insurance Services Inc. |
| 8:2019cv02347 |
| December 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John D Early |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Healthy Halo Insurance Services Inc. answer now due 2/6/2020, filed by Defendant Healthy Halo Insurance Services Inc..(Contreras, Jesse) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Healthy Halo Insurance Services Inc. answer now due 1/28/2020, filed by Defendant Healthy Halo Insurance Services Inc..(Contreras, Jesse) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Healthy Halo Insurance Services Inc., identifying Healthy Halo Insurance Services, Inc.. (Attorney Jesse J Contreras added to party Healthy Halo Insurance Services Inc.(pty:dft))(Contreras, Jesse) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff William Martin, upon Defendant Healthy Halo Insurance Services Inc. served on 12/17/2019, answer due 1/7/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Brent Huerta, Manager/Authorized to Accept in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (King, Bradley) |
| Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (rrp) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Healthy Halo Insurance Services Inc. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (lh) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff William Martin, (King, Bradley) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff William Martin. (King, Bradley) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff William Martin. (King, Bradley) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24899227 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff William Martin. (Attorney Bradley K King added to party William Martin(pty:pla))(King, Bradley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: William Martin v. Healthy Halo Insurance Services Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Healthy Halo Insurance Services Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jesse J Contreras |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: William Martin | |
| Represented By: | Bradley K King |
| Represented By: | Robert Ahdoot |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
