James Zarian v. 20000 Ventura LLC et al
| James Zarian |
| Does 1-10, Sangak Bread & Foods, LLC, 20000 Ventura LLC and Sangak Bread and Foods, LLC |
| 8:2019cv02354 |
| December 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John D Early |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER STAYING ACTION PENDING FINAL SETTLEMENT, REMOVING CASE FROM ACTIVE CASELOAD, AND FILING OF DISMISSAL by Judge Josephine L. Staton. On 1/9/2020, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Settlement (doc. #14 ), indicating that the case has fully settled. Based thereon, the Court hereby orders all proceedings in the case stayed pending final settlement. Further ordered that this action is removed from the Court's active caseload The parties shall file a Stipulation of Dismissal no later than 2/10/2020 (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Settlement and request to vacate all currently set dates filed by Plaintiff James Zarian. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Seabock, Amanda) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Zarian, upon Defendant Sangak Bread and Foods, LLC served on 12/26/2019, answer due 1/16/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon aguee doe person in charge in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 12
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DECLINING Supplemental Jurisdiction and DISMISSING State-law Claim Without Prejudice by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim, and the claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to filing in state court. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION). (jp)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff James Zarianto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, #10 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Proof of service)(Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER I(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause, in writing, no later than ten (10) days from the date of this Order, why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim. (lom)
|
| Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (tg) |
| Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (tg) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants 20000 Ventura LLC, Sangak Bread and Foods, LLC. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff James Zarian. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff James Zarian, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff James Zarian. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24906066 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff James Zarian. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party James Zarian(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
