Ashwani Kumar v. Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security et al
| Ashwani Kumar |
| Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service USCIS, US Attorney General and Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security |
| 8:2019cv02361 |
| December 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE re Filing of Habeas Corpus Petition, filed by Petitioner Ashwani Kumar. (dml) |
| Filing 6 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case filed by Federal Respondents Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service USCIS, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, US Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Attachment 2, #3 POS)(Casselman, Jill) |
| Filing 5 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 2/14/2020 re Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) #1 filed by Respondents Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service USCIS, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, US Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proof of Service) (Casselman, Jill) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Jill S Casselman counsel for Respondents Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service USCIS, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, US Attorney General. Adding Jill S. Casselman as counsel of record for Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security et al. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Respondents Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, et al.. (Attachments: #1 POS)(Attorney Jill S Casselman added to party Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service USCIS(pty:res), Attorney Jill S Casselman added to party Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security(pty:res), Attorney Jill S Casselman added to party US Attorney General(pty:res))(Casselman, Jill) |
Filing 3
ORDER REQUIRING ANSWER/RETURN TO PETITION by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. that Respondent Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service USCIS file Answer to the Petition not later than 2/3/2020; Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security file Answer to the Petition not later than 2/3/2020; US Attorney General file Answer to the Petition not later than 2/3/2020. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the United States Attorneys Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition) (dml)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and referred to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In Federal Custody (28:2241), filed by Petitioner Ashwani Kumar. Case assigned to Judge Stephen V. Wilson and referred to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (Filing fee $ 5 Paid.) (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
