Beverly Shuwoy v. Allergan Inc. et al
| Beverly Shuwoy |
| ALLERGAN USA, INC, Allergan plc, ALLERGAN INC. f/k/a/ INAMED CORPORATION f/k/a MCGHAN MEDICAL CORPORATION, Allergan Inc., Allergan USA, Inc., McGhan Medical Corporation and Inamed Corporation |
| 8:2019cv02480 |
| December 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - RECEIVED Notice of Receipt of Electronic Case Transfer from District of New Jersey, 2:20-cv-00943 filed 1/29/2020. (iv) |
| Filing 11 Conditional Transfer Order - 2 from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL 2921, transferring case to USDC, District of New Jersey and assigned to Honorable Brian R Martinotti. Case transferred electronically. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom) |
Filing 10
ORDER GRANTING Stipulation to Stay Proceeding Pending Transfer to MDL 2921 #8 by Judge Josephine L. Staton. The Court GRANTS the joint stipulation. All proceedings in this matter are STAYED pending transfer to MDL 2921 that is pending in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. (jp)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Parties, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendant Allergan USA, Inc., Allergan Inc..(Montenegro, Mayela) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Transfer to MDL 2921 filed by defendants Allergan Inc., Allergan USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Mayela Carmen Montenegro added to party Allergan Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Mayela Carmen Montenegro added to party Allergan USA, Inc.(pty:dft))(Montenegro, Mayela) |
| Filing 7 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (tg) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments No. 1 Civil Cover Sheet and No. 2 Summons should not have been attached to Docket Entry No. 1. Each document should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (lh) |
| Filing 4 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Allergan Inc., Allergan USA, Inc., Allergan plc. (lh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (lh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25003368 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Beverly Shuwoy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Attorney Jennifer A Lenze added to party Beverly Shuwoy(pty:pla))(Lenze, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
