Corneliu Gavriliuc v. Teksystems, Inc. et al
| Corneliu Gavriliuc |
| Does 1 through 100, inclusive, Teksystems, Inc., TEKsystems Global Services, LLC and Perspecta Enterprise Solutions, LLC |
| 8:2019cv02492 |
| December 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 25
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION by Judge Josephine L. Staton that Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2) #24 , the instant action, Corneliu Gavriliuc v. TEKsystems, Inc., et al., Case No. 8:19-cv-02492 JLS (DFMx), is hereby dismissed without prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
| Filing 24 NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff Corneliu Gavriliuc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hall, Corey) |
|
Filing 23
ORDER GRANTING Joint Stipulation to Continue Scheduling Conference and Hearing on Perspecta Enterprise Solutions, LLC's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings #21 by Judge Josephine L. Staton as follows: The Scheduling Conference in this matter is continued from 3/6/2020 to 4/24/2020 at 10:30 AM; and The hearing on Perspecta Enterprise Solutions, LLC's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to On the Pleadings Pursuant to Rule 12(C) #15 is continued from 4/10/2020 to 4/24/2020 at 10:30 AM. (jp)
|
| Filing 22 NOTICE OF LODGING filed of Proposed Order re Stipulation to Continue, #21 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hearne, Heather) |
| Filing 21 Joint STIPULATION to Continue Scheduling Conference and Hearing on Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings from April 10, 2020 to April 24, 2020 Re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to On the Pleadings Pursuant to Rule 12(C) #15 filed by defendant Perspecta Enterprise Solutions, LLC.(Hearne, Heather) |
| Filing 20 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING HEARING: On the Court's own motion, Defendant Perspecta Enterprise Solution's Motion Judgment on the Pleadings #15 , is ordered CONTINUED from 3/6/2020 to 4/10/2020 at 10:30 a.m. before Judge Josephine L. Staton. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tg) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff Corneliu Gavriliuc pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) Notice of Dismissal as to TEKsystems Global Services, LLC, Teksystems, Inc.. (Hall, Corey) |
| Filing 18 REPLY In Support NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to On the Pleadings Pursuant to Rule 12(C) #15 filed by Defendant Perspecta Enterprise Solutions, LLC. (Hearne, Heather) |
| Filing 17 REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint #8 filed by Defendants TEKsystems Global Services, LLC, Teksystems, Inc.. (Kun, Michael) |
| Filing 16 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to On the Pleadings Pursuant to Rule 12(C) #15 filed by Defendant Perspecta Enterprise Solutions, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Hearne, Heather) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to On the Pleadings Pursuant to Rule 12(C) filed by Defendant Perspecta Enterprise Solutions, LLC. Motion set for hearing on 3/6/2020 at 10:30 AM before Judge Josephine L. Staton. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Hearne, Heather) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re [Proposed] Order re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint #8 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Defendants TEKsystems, Inc. and TEKsystems Global Services, LLC's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint)(Kun, Michael) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Motion to Dismiss #8 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. Other error(s) with document(s): [Proposed] Order was not submitted as a separate, additional attachment to the Motion. A stand-alone proposed order can be e-filed by submitting a Notice of Lodging with the separate, additional attachment of the [proposed] order. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (bm) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Scheduling Conference is set for 3/6/2020 at 10:30 AM before Judge Josephine L. Staton. (tg)
|
| Filing 11 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (tg) |
| Filing 10 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint #8 filed by Defendants TEKsystems Global Services, LLC, Teksystems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Kun, Michael) |
| Filing 9 DECLARATION of Michael S. Kun in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint #8 filed by Defendants TEKsystems Global Services, LLC, Teksystems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Kun, Michael) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendants TEKsystems Global Services, LLC, Teksystems, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 3/6/2020 at 10:30 AM before Judge Josephine L. Staton. (Kun, Michael) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Douglas F. McCormick. New Case Number 8:19-cv-02492 JLS (DFMx). (esa) |
| COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by defendant Perspecta Enterprise Solutions, LLC. (non-conformed, submitted as document 1, attachment 2)(esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, Perspecta Enterprise Solutions, LLC, TEKsystems Global Services, LLC, Teksystems, Inc., Jury Demand, filed by plaintiff Corneliu Gavriliuc. (filed in state court 10/25/19, submitted as document 1, attachment 1, p. 3) (esa) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendants TEKsystems Global Services, LLC, Teksystems, Inc. identifying Allegis Group, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Kun, Michael) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant TEKsystems Global Services, LLC, Teksystems, Inc., identifying TEKsystems, Inc.. (Kun, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants TEKsystems Global Services, LLC, Teksystems, Inc.. (Kun, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court, County of Orange, case number 30-2019-01107790 Receipt No: 0973-25004784 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant TEKsystems Global Services, LLC, Teksystems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Gavriliuc Complaint, #2 Perspecta Enterprises Answer, #3 Certificate of Service, #4 Declaration Heather D. Hearne, #5 Declaration Lisa Webb) (Attorney Michael S Kun added to party TEKsystems Global Services, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Michael S Kun added to party Teksystems, Inc.(pty:dft))(Kun, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
