Belen Acevedo v. Euclid Retail, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Belen Acevedo
Defendant: Does 1-10, OC Medical Supply Incorporated and Euclid Retail, LLC
Case Number: 8:2019cv02508
Filed: December 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Karen E Scott
Referring Judge: Josephine L Staton
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 27, 2020 Filing 18 NOTICE of Settlement and request to vacate all currently set dates filed by Plaintiff Belen Acevedo. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Seabock, Amanda)
February 3, 2020 Filing 17 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant OC Medical Supply Incorporated #15 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as: Time to respond has not expired. (jp)
February 3, 2020 Filing 16 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File February 27, 2020 filed by defendant OC Medical Supply Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Attorney Craig D McMahon added to party OC Medical Supply Incorporated(pty:dft))(McMahon, Craig)
January 31, 2020 Filing 15 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant OC Medical Supply Incorporated filed by Plaintiff Belen Acevedo. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proof of service) (Grace, Phyl)
January 27, 2020 Filing 14 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Euclid Retail, LLC answer now due 2/28/2020, filed by Defendant Euclid Retail, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Attorney Craig D McMahon added to party Euclid Retail, LLC(pty:dft))(McMahon, Craig)
January 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DECLINING SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION AND DISMISSING STATE-LAW CLAIM WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim, and the claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to filing in state court. (jp)
January 13, 2020 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Belen Acevedo, upon Defendant OC Medical Supply Incorporated served on 1/7/2020, answer due 1/28/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: SHOLA OJO in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell)
January 10, 2020 Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Belen Acevedoto Order to Show Cause, #10 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Proof of service)(Handy, Russell)
January 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION by Judge Josephine L. Staton.Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause, in writing, no later than ten (10) days from the date of this Order, why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim. (see document for further details) (hr)
January 2, 2020 Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (tg)
January 2, 2020 Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (tg)
December 30, 2019 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants Euclid Retail, LLC, OC Medical Supply Incorporated. (esa)
December 30, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
December 30, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (esa)
December 30, 2019 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Belen Acevedo. (Handy, Russell)
December 30, 2019 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiif Belen Acevedo, (Handy, Russell)
December 30, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Belen Acevedo. (Handy, Russell)
December 30, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25030196 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Belen Acevedo. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Belen Acevedo(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Belen Acevedo v. Euclid Retail, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OC Medical Supply Incorporated
Represented By: Craig D McMahon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Euclid Retail, LLC
Represented By: Craig D McMahon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Belen Acevedo
Represented By: Dennis Jay Price, II
Represented By: Phyl Grace
Represented By: Raymond George Ballister, Jr
Represented By: Russell C Handy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?