Belen Acevedo v. FM Restaurants El Torito Opco, LLC, et al
| Belen Acevedo |
| FM Restaurants El Torito Opco, LLC, and Does 1-10 |
| 8:2019cv02511 |
| December 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen E Scott |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to FM Restaurants El Torito Opco, LLC, answer now due 2/27/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant FM Restaurants El Torito Opco, LLC,.(Attorney Ryan Guiboa added to party FM Restaurants El Torito Opco, LLC,(pty:dft))(Guiboa, Ryan) |
Filing 14
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DECLINING SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION AND DISMISSING STATE-LAW CLAIM WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs Unruh Act claim, and the claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to filing in state court. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION). (jp)
|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Belen Acevedoto Order to Show Cause, #10 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Proof of service)(Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Belen Acevedo, re Notice to Parties ADA Disability Access Litigation (ADR-20) #9 , Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #8 served on 1/9/2020. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Belen Acevedo, upon Defendant FM Restaurants El Torito Opco, LLC, served on 1/7/2020, answer due 1/28/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: C T CORPORATION SYSTEM -Gabriella Sanchez, intake specialist in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (tg) |
| Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (tg) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION by Judge Josephine L. Staton: Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause, in writing, no later thanten (10) days from the date of this Order, why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION). (jp)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant FM Restaurants El Torito Opco, LLC. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Belen Acevedo. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Belen Acevedo, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Belen Acevedo. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25030213 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiif Belen Acevedo. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Belen Acevedo(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
