Belen Acevedo v. Warland Investments Company et al
| Belen Acevedo |
| Warland Investments Company, Does 1-10, Hope I. Warschaw, Mark's Mex., Inc. and Marks Mex, Inc. |
| 8:2020cv00009 |
| January 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| James V Selna |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Parties, filed by Defendant, Mark's Mex Marks Mex, Inc..(Attorney Douglas M Campbell added to party Marks Mex, Inc.(pty:dft))(Campbell, Douglas) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Belen Acevedo, upon Defendant Marks Mex, Inc. served on 2/6/2020, answer due 2/27/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Brianna Mulligan -Restaraunt Manager in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Belen Acevedo, upon Defendant Warland Investments Company served on 2/8/2020, answer due 3/2/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Carl W. Robertson Jr in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Belen Acevedo, upon Defendant Hope I. Warschaw(representative capacity as trustee of The Hope Warschaw Trust Established June 3, 2014) served on 1/25/2020, answer due 2/18/2020; Hope I. Warschaw(in individual ) served on 1/25/2020, answer due 2/18/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Hope I. Warschaw in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 9
Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference set for 3/16/2020 at 10:00 a.m. before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, and Response to the Order to Show Cause Why the Court Should Not Decline to Exercise Supplemental Jurisdiction Over the Asserted State Claims, by 3/9/2020. (rrp)
|
| Filing 8 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Marks Mex, Inc., Warland Investments Company, Hope I. Warschaw (representative capacity as trustee of The Hope Warschaw Trust Established June 3, 2014), Hope I. Warschaw (in individual ). (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Belen Acevedo. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Belen Acevedo, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Belen Acevedo. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25050341 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Belen Acevedo. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Belen Acevedo(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
