Christine Drage et al v. Jay Weil et al
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Pons-Bunney and Christine E. Drage
Defendant: Jay Weil
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Jean Weil
3Rd Party Defendant: The Weil & Drage Retirement Plan and Weil & Drage, APC
Case Number: 8:2020cv00014
Filed: January 3, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John D Early
Referring Judge: James V Selna
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER DEEMING THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT SERVED AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADING #42 , by Judge James V. Selna. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the last day for Third-Party Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to Third-Party Plaintiff Jean Weil's Third-Party Complaint is Wednesday, July 15, 2020. *See order for details.* (es)
June 24, 2020 Filing 42 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to The Weil & Drage Retirement Plan answer now due 7/15/2020; Weil & Drage, APC answer now due 7/15/2020, re Third Party Complaint, #39 filed by Defendant Jean Weil; Jay Weil. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Deeming Third-Party Complaint Served and Setting Deadline for Responsive Pleading)(Markun, David)
June 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER APPROVING JOINT STIPULATION RE: SELECTION OF MEDIATOR #40 by Judge James V. Selna. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties' selection of Robert Meyer as a mediator and the parties' proposed mediation date of August 27, 2020 are APPROVED. The Court welcomes Mr. Meyer's assistance. (es)
June 9, 2020 Filing 40 STIPULATION REGARDING SELECTION of Panel Mediator filed. Parties stipulate that Robert Meyer may serve as Panel Mediator. Plaintiff obtained the Panel Mediators consent to serve. All parties and the Panel Mediator have agreed that the mediation will be held on 8/27/2020 and counsel will submit mediation statements seven (7) calendar days before the session. Filed by Plaintiffs Christine E. Drage, Jacqueline Pons-Bunney (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Tufts, David)
June 8, 2020 Filing 39 THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against Third-Party Defendants The Weil & Drage Retirement Plan, Weil & Drage, APC, filed by Third-Party Plaintiff Jean Weil. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Certificate & Notice of Interested Parties)(Markun, David)
June 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT #37 by Judge James V. Selna. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Jean Weil's Third-Party Complaint shall be separately filed within five days. (See order.) (es)
June 1, 2020 Filing 37 Joint STIPULATION for Leave to File Third-Party Complaint filed by Defendants Jay Weil, Jean Weil. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Third Party Complaint, #2 Proposed Order Granting Leave to File Third Party Complaint)(Markun, David)
May 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER RE: DEADLINE FOR SELECTION OF MEDIATOR by Judge James V. Selna. IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall have up to and including June 9, 2020, to jointly select a mediator. #35 (es)
May 11, 2020 Filing 35 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File filed by Plaintiffs Christine E. Drage, Jacqueline Pons-Bunney. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Tufts, David)
April 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MINUTE ORDER [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER RE SCHEDULING DATES by Judge James V. Selna: The Court has read and considered the parties Rule 26(f) Report and sets the following dates: Court Trial February 16, 2021at 8:30 a.m. Final PreTrial Conference February 1, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. Discovery Cut-off August 31, 2020. Expert Discovery Cut-off October 30, 2020. Law and Motion Cut-off December 21, 2020 at 1:30 p.m. The Court orders that any settlement discussions shall be completed not later than October 16, 2020. (See document for further details.) (es)
April 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER FOR COURT TRIAL SETTING DATES; PREPARATION FOR TRIAL; AND GOVERNING ATTORNEY AND PARTY CONDUCT AT TRIAL before Judge James V. Selna. (See Document for Details and Deadlines) (lb)
March 30, 2020 Filing 32 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 0 days, filed by Plaintiffs Christine E. Drage, Jacqueline Pons-Bunney.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Schedule)(Tufts, David)
February 21, 2020 Filing 31 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiffs Christine E. Drage, Jacqueline Pons-Bunney, re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #13 served on 2/4/20. (Tufts, David)
February 20, 2020 Filing 30 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #27 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendants Jay Weil, Jean Weil.(Eng, Kevin)
February 20, 2020 Filing 29 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Jay Weil, Jean Weil, (Eng, Kevin)
February 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 28 Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference set for 4/6/2020 at 11:00 a.m. before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by 3/30/2020. (rrp)
February 6, 2020 Filing 27 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Jay Weil, Jean Weil amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , filed by Plaintiffs Christine E. Drage, Jacqueline Pons-Bunney(Tufts, David)
January 30, 2020 Filing 26 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Jean Weil answer now due 2/13/2020; Jay Weil answer now due 2/13/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Jean Weil; Jay Weil.(Attorney Kevin K Eng added to party Jay Weil(pty:dft), Attorney Kevin K Eng added to party Jean Weil(pty:dft))(Eng, Kevin)
January 28, 2020 Filing 25 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Christine E. Drage, Jacqueline Pons-Bunney, upon Defendant Jean Weil served on 1/9/2020, answer due 1/30/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jean Weil in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Tufts, David)
January 28, 2020 Filing 24 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Christine E. Drage, Jacqueline Pons-Bunney, upon Defendant Jay Weil served on 1/9/2020, answer due 1/30/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jay Weil in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Tufts, David)
January 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER by Judge James V. Selna, GRANTING #21 Non-Resident Attorney Lloyd W. Waldan APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Christine Drage and Jaqueline Pons-Bunney, designating Chris C. Scheithauer as local counsel. (es)
January 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER by Judge James V. Selna, GRANTING #20 Non-Resident Attorney Brooke N. Edwards APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Christine Drage and Jaqueline Pons-Bunney, designating Chris C. Scheithauer as local counsel. (es)
January 23, 2020 Filing 21 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Lloyd W. Waldan to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Jacqueline Pons-Bunney (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400.00 Previously Paid on 1/21/2020, Receipt No. 097325157027) filed by Plaintiff Jacqueline Pons-Bunney. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Scheithauer, Christopher)
January 23, 2020 Filing 20 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Brooke N. Edwards to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Christine E. Drage, Jacqueline Pons-Bunney (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400.00 Previously Paid on 1/21/2020, Receipt No. 097325156955) filed by Plaintiff Christine E. Drage, Jacqueline Pons-Bunney. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Scheithauer, Christopher)
January 23, 2020 Filing 19 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Appearance, #15 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel G123. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak)
January 21, 2020 Filing 18 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Brooke N. Edwards to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Christine E. Drage, Jacqueline Pons-Bunney (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-25156955) #16 , APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Waldan W. Lloyd to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Christine E. Drage, Jacqueline Pons-Bunney (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-25157027) #17 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 5-4.3.4 Application not hand-signed. Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(a) Application not complete: state and/or federal courts to which the applicant has been admitted are not listed. (lt)
January 21, 2020 Filing 17 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Waldan W. Lloyd to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Christine E. Drage, Jacqueline Pons-Bunney (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-25157027) filed by Plaintiffs Christine E. Drage, Jacqueline Pons-Bunney. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Scheithauer, Christopher)
January 21, 2020 Filing 16 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Brooke N. Edwards to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Christine E. Drage, Jacqueline Pons-Bunney (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-25156955) filed by Plaintiffs Christine E. Drage, Jacqueline Pons-Bunney. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Scheithauer, Christopher)
January 21, 2020 Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Christopher C Scheithauer on behalf of Plaintiffs Christine E. Drage, Jacqueline Pons-Bunney (Attorney Christopher C Scheithauer added to party Christine E. Drage(pty:pla), Attorney Christopher C Scheithauer added to party Jacqueline Pons-Bunney(pty:pla))(Scheithauer, Christopher)
January 9, 2020 Filing 14 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Christine E. Drage, Jacqueline Pons-Bunney, identifying Weil & Drage, P.C., Weil & Drage Retirement Plan. (Tufts, David)
January 9, 2020 Filing 13 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb)
January 8, 2020 Filing 12 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is Summons Request. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap)
January 8, 2020 Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Jean Weil. (ghap)
January 8, 2020 Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Jay Weil. (ghap)
January 8, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap)
January 8, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney W Waldan Lloyd. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap)
January 8, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
January 8, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (ghap)
January 6, 2020 Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Subpoena filed by Plaintiffs Christine E. Drage, Jacqueline Pons-Bunney. (Tufts, David)
January 3, 2020 Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Christine E. Drage, Jacqueline Pons-Bunney. (Tufts, David)
January 3, 2020 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Christine E. Drage, Jacqueline Pons-Bunney. (Tufts, David)
January 3, 2020 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Christine E. Drage, Jacqueline Pons-Bunney. (Tufts, David)
January 3, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25057648 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Christine E. Drage, Jacqueline Pons-Bunney. (Attorney David W Tufts added to party Christine E. Drage(pty:pla), Attorney David W Tufts added to party Jacqueline Pons-Bunney(pty:pla))(Tufts, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Christine Drage et al v. Jay Weil et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Pons-Bunney
Represented By: David W Tufts
Represented By: Brooke N Edwards
Represented By: W Waldan Lloyd
Represented By: Christopher C Scheithauer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christine E. Drage
Represented By: David W Tufts
Represented By: Brooke N Edwards
Represented By: W Waldan Lloyd
Represented By: Christopher C Scheithauer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jay Weil
Represented By: Andrew Patrick Danza
Represented By: David S Markun
Represented By: Kevin K Eng
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
3rd party plaintiff: Jean Weil
Represented By: Andrew Patrick Danza
Represented By: David S Markun
Represented By: Kevin K Eng
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
3rd party defendant: The Weil & Drage Retirement Plan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
3rd party defendant: Weil & Drage, APC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?