P Assets, Inc. v. Alpin Nazaryan et al
| P Assets, Inc. |
| Alpin Nazaryan, Does 1 through 10, inclusive and Nadia M. Atalah |
| 8:2020cv00036 |
| January 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER TO STRIKE ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENT(S) by Judge Josephine L. Staton: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: Court Consideration #13 , for the following reasons: Case is closed. The Court lacks jurisdiction. (jp)
|
| Filing 16 Receipt of Letter of Transmittal - Remand to Superior Court. (jp) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL filed by plaintiff P Assets, Inc., re Notice of Related Case(s) #12 , REQUEST MOTION for Consideration #13 . (jp) |
| Filing 13 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER DATED 1/30/2020, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. #15 ] - Court Consideration filed by Defendant Alpin Nazaryan. (jp). Modified on 1/30/2020 (jp). |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Related Case Pursuant to Civil Local rule #83-1.3.1 filed by Defendant Alpin Nazaryan. (jp) |
| Filing 11 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Orange County Superior court - West Justice Center. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Orange County Superior court - West Justice Center at Westminster. Case number: 30-02019-01117820-CL-UD-WJC. (jp) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT by Judge Josephine L. Staton that this matter be, and hereby is, REMANDED to the Superior court of California for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Made JS-6 Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Judge Josephine L. Staton that the request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #5 is hereby DENIED. IT IS RECOMMENDED by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick for the following reasons: (1) District Court lacks jurisdiction. (2) See Order Remanding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is hereby REMANDED to State Court. (jp)
|
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL filed by Defendant Nadia M. Atalah, re Notice of Removal, #1 served on 1/8/20. (car) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (car) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Defendant Nadia M. Atalah. (car) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Nadia M. Atalah (car) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION OF NADIA M. ATALAH IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF ACTION TO FEDERAL COURT, #1 (car) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT filed by Defendant Nadia M. Atalah. (car) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California County of Orange, case number 30-02019-01117820-CL-UD-WJC with Conformed copy of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick, filed by Defendant Nadia M. Atalah. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint Re Notice of Removal, filed by plaintiff P Assets, Inc. Filed in state Court on 12/12/19 Submitted with pg. 12 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
