Kristine Farrington v. Andrew Saul
| Kristine Farrington |
| Andrew Saul |
| 8:2020cv00039 |
| January 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John D Early |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Kristine Farrington. (Leland, Judith) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Kristine Farrington, upon Defendant Andrew Saul served on 2/3/2020, answer due 4/3/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Unknown. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Unknown. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Unknown. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Leland, Judith) |
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge John D. Early, re: Procedures in Social Security Appeal. (mba)
|
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andrew Saul. (mba) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Magistrate Judge John D. Early: Granting #2 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (mba)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Kristine Farrington. (Leland, Judith) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Kristine Farrington, identifying Kristine Farrington. (Leland, Judith) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Kristine Farrington. (Leland, Judith) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Kristine Farrington. (Leland, Judith) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Kristine Farrington. (Attorney Judith S Leland added to party Kristine Farrington(pty:pla))(Leland, Judith) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kristine Farrington v. Andrew Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney SA-CV |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kristine Farrington | |
| Represented By: | Judith S Leland |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
