Kaori Doling v. Toridoll Dining California, LLC et al
| Kaori Doling |
| Toridoll Dining California, LLC, Jun Goto and Does 1 through 20, inclusive |
| 8:2020cv00163 |
| January 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John D Early |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 First STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to negotiated settlement filed by Plaintiff Kaori Doling. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hankey, Jordan) |
Filing 13
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge John D. Early re Stipulation for Protective Order #12 . (see document for details) (hr)
|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Defendants Jun Goto, Toridoll Dining California, LLC.(Bednarova, Andrea) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No. 3 by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Case is ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than March 5, 2021. (tg)
|
| Filing 10 CIVIL TRIAL ORDER for cases assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton. (tg) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTES (In Chambers) SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Josephine L. Staton: On the Court's own motion, the Scheduling Conference set for hearing March 13, 2020, is VACATED and the following schedule is set. Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/7/2021 at 10:30 AM. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION). (jp)
|
| Filing 8 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 10 days, filed by Defendants Jun Goto, Toridoll Dining California, LLC.. (Bednarova, Andrea) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: A Scheduling Conference is set for 3/13/2020 at 10:30 AM before Judge Josephine L. Staton. See document for details. (tg)
|
| Filing 6 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (tg) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Jun Goto, Toridoll Dining California, LLC. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Kaori Doling. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 11/04/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
| NON CONFORM FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendants Jun Goto, Toridoll Dining California, LLC. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT B)(ghap) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Toridoll Dining California, LLC, identifying Tokyo Table Holdings, LLC; Crackin' Kitchen USA, LLC; Ton-ichi USA, LLC; Toridoll Dining Corporation; Toridoll Holding Ltd. (Hong Kong); Toridoll Holdings Corporation (Japan). (Bednarova, Andrea) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Jun Goto, Toridoll Dining California, LLC. (Bednarova, Andrea) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2019-01109516-CU-WT-CJC Receipt No: 0973-25197262 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants Jun Goto, Toridoll Dining California, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exh. A and B, #2 Certificate of Service) (Attorney Andrea Bednarova added to party Jun Goto(pty:dft), Attorney Andrea Bednarova added to party Toridoll Dining California, LLC(pty:dft))(Bednarova, Andrea) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
