Ricardo Ramos v. Citibank, N.A.
Ricardo Ramos |
Citibank, N.A. |
8:2020cv00169 |
January 27, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Douglas F McCormick |
Josephine L Staton |
Other Statutory Actions |
47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER GRANTING Stipulation to Stay Action and Arbitrate Claims #11 by Judge Josephine L. Staton, hereby GRANTS the relief sought therein. This case is stayed pending completion of arbitration proceedings pursuant to the terms of the arbitration provision contained in the credit card agreement(s) attached to the Stipulation as Exhibit 1. The parties are ordered to file a joint status report upon the earlier of six months from the date of this order or within ten (10) days of completion of Arbitration. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION to Stay Case pending arbitration filed by Defendant Citibank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Proposed Order)(Sasso, Marcos) |
Filing 10 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Ricardo Ramos, upon Defendant Citibank, N.A. served on 2/4/2020, answer due 3/10/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Hammoud, Youssef) |
Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Citibank, N.A. answer now due 3/10/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Citibank, N.A..(Attorney Marcos Daniel Sasso added to party Citibank, N.A.(pty:dft))(Sasso, Marcos) |
Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (tg) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Citibank, N.A. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (et) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Ricardo Ramos. (Hammoud, Youssef) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Ricardo Ramos, (Hammoud, Youssef) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Ricardo Ramos. (Hammoud, Youssef) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25200635 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Ricardo Ramos. (Attorney Youssef Hussein Hammoud added to party Ricardo Ramos(pty:pla))(Hammoud, Youssef) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ricardo Ramos v. Citibank, N.A. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ricardo Ramos | |
Represented By: | Youssef Hussein Hammoud |
Represented By: | Lauren Tegan Rodkey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Citibank, N.A. | |
Represented By: | Marcos Daniel Sasso |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.