Essex Management Corporation v. Edward Lancaster Jetmore IV et al
| Essex Management Corporation |
| Does 1 to 10, inclusive, Kristen Stacy and Edward Lancaster Jetmore, IV |
| 8:2020cv00205 |
| January 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Rent Lease & Ejectment |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Receipt of Acknowledgment of documents by Superior Court of California County of Orange, case no. 30-02019-01121056-CL-UD-HJC. (lom) |
| Filing 13 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Orange County Superior court - North Justice Center. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Orange County Superior Court - North Justice Center at Fullerton. Case number: 30-02019-01121056-CL-UD-HJC. (jp) |
Filing 12
ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT by Judge Josephine L. Staton that this matter be, and hereby is, REMANDED to the Superior Court of California for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Made JS-6 Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Judge Josephine L. Staton that the request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #4 is hereby DENIED. IT IS RECOMMENDED by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick for the following reasons: (1) District court lacks jurisdiction. See Order Remanding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is hereby REMANDED to State Court. (jp)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Judge Josephine L. Staton that the request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #3 is hereby DENIED. IT IS RECOMMENDED by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick for the following reasons: (1) District court lacks jurisdiction. See Order Remanding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is hereby REMANDED to State Court. (jp)
|
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Essex Management Corporation, identifying Essex Management Corporation. (Andrews, R) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Orange County Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Essex Management Corporation. Motion set for hearing on 3/27/2020 at 10:30 AM before Judge Josephine L. Staton. (Andrews, R) |
| Filing 7 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Remand Case to Orange County Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Essex Management Corporation. (Attorney R Scott Andrews added to party Essex Management Corporation(pty:pla)) (Andrews, R) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (car) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS filed by Defendant Kristen Stacy. (car) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS filed by Defendant Edward Lancaster Jetmore, IV. (car) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Edward Lancaster Jetmore, IV, Kristen Stacy (car) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California County of Orange, case number 30-02019-01121056-CL-UD-HJC with Conformed copy of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick, filed by Defendants Edward Lancaster Jetmore, IV, Kristen Stacy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
