Eisenman Family Trust et al v. Oudree Ellis et al
| David A. Eisenman, Marilyn R. Eisenman and Eisenman Family Trust |
| Stormi Sanders, Trinity Ellis, Oudree Ellis and Does I to V |
| 8:2020cv00265 |
| February 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: Granting #11 APPLICATION for Pro Se Electronic Filing. The applicant must register to use the Courts CM/ECF System within five (5) days of being served with this order. Registration information is available at the Pro Se Litigant E-Filing web page located on the Courts website. Upon registering, the applicant will receive a CM/ECF login and password that will allow him/her to file non- sealed documents electronically in this case only. Any documents being submitted under seal must be manually filed with the Clerk. (twdb)
|
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE by mail filed by defendant Oudree Ellis, re APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case #11 , Affidavit #12 served on 2/21/20. (twdb) |
| Filing 12 Defendant's Information and Belief AFFIDAVIT by affiant: Oudree Ellis, filed by Defendant Oudree Ellis (twdb) |
| Filing 11 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by defendant Oudree Ellis. (twdb) |
| Filing 10 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Superior Court of California. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Superior Court of California. (twdb) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter, Remanding case to Superior Court of California, County of Orange, Case number 30-2019-01100178-CL-UD-WJC. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this matter be, and hereby is, REMANDED to the Superior Court of California listed above, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (twdb)
|
| Filing 8 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge David O. Carter: ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #3 AND DENYING EMERGENCY MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER #7 . (twdb) |
| Filing 7 EMERGENCY NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction filed by defendant Oudree Ellis. (Attachments: #1 proposed order) (twdb) |
|
Filing 6
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER upon filing of the complaint by Judge David O. Carter. (kd)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (et) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Defendant Oudree Ellis. (et) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Oudree Ellis. (et) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of CA for the County of Orange, West Justice Center, case number 30-02019-01100178-CL-UD-WJC with CONFORMED E-FILED copy of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge David O. Carter, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick., filed by Defendant Oudree Ellis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
