In re Dana Kim Shelton
Appellant: Erin Ellen Larson, Sharon Deon Sims and Daniel Keith Larson
Appellee: Dana Kim Shelton
Case Number: 8:2020cv00268
Filed: February 11, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: James V Selna
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeal (801)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 (AMENDED) NOTICE OF APPEAL AND STATEMENT OF ELECTION Re: Order for Contempt for Violation of the Discharge Injunction Against (1) Sharon Deon Sims, (2) Daniel Keith Larson and (3) Erin Ellen Larson filed and entered 1/30/2020 by Bankruptcy Judge Scott C. Clarkson (copy attached), filed in the Bankruptcy Court 2/13/2020. Bankruptcy Case No.: 8:17-cv-12887-SC, Adversary No.: N/A, BAP Case No.: N/A, filed by Appellant Daniel Keith Larson. (es)
February 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb)
February 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
February 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE REGARDING APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. The appeal has been assigned to Judge James V. Selna. Refer to the Notice for specifics. (esa)
February 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES regarding failure to pay filing fee (esa)
February 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Appeal Deficiency to Appellant(esa)
February 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERRAL OF APPEAL to U.S. District Court prepared by the United States Bankruptcy Court on 2/10/20. (esa)
February 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF APPEAL AND STATEMENT OF ELECTION Re: ORDER for contempt for violation of the discharge injunction entered on 1/30/20 by Bankruptcy Judge Scott C. Clarkson, filed in the Bankruptcy Court on 2/7/20. Bankruptcy Court case number: 8:17-cv-12887 SC, Adversary number: 8:18-ap-01006 SC, BAP case number: cc-18-1146., filed by appellants Daniel Keith Larson, Sharon Deon Sims, Erin Ellen Larson. (Attachments: #1 bk dkt) (esa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In re Dana Kim Shelton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Erin Ellen Larson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Sharon Deon Sims
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Daniel Keith Larson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Dana Kim Shelton
Represented By: Christopher Paul Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?