Dominique Daniels v. G4S Secure Solutions USA, Inc. et al
| Dominique Daniels |
| Anthoni D. King, III, G4S Secure Solutions USA, Inc., Vince Guarino, Dove Canyon Master Association and Seabreeze Management Company, Inc. |
| 8:2020cv00283 |
| February 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| John D Early |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Dominique Daniels. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Dominique Daniels. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Dove Canyon Master Association, G4S Secure Solutions USA, Inc., Vince Guarino, Anthoni D. King, III, Seabreeze Management Company, Inc..Case assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge John D Early. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Dominique Daniels. (Attachments: #1 CV-71) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
