JD Recovery, LLC v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc. et al
| JD Recovery, LLC |
| UHC OF CALIFORNIA,, UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, INC.,, OPTUM, INC.,, Optum Services, Inc., United Healthcare Insurance Company, UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, INC., a California corporation, OPTUMINSIGHT, INC., a Delaware corporation, VIANT, INC.,, UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLC, MULTIPLAN, INC.,, United HealthCare Services, Inc.,, UHC of California, Viant, Inc., Multiplan, Inc., United Behavioral Health, Inc., Optuminsight, Inc., Optum, Inc., UnitedHealth Group, Inc. and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive |
| 8:2020cv00341 |
| February 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| James V Selna |
| Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. § 4053 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
|
|
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Multiplan, Inc., Optum Services, Inc., Optum, Inc., Optuminsight, Inc., UHC of California, United Behavioral Health, Inc., United HealthCare Services, Inc., United Healthcare Insurance Company, United Healthcare Services LLC, UnitedHealth Group, Inc., and Viant, Inc. (Attachments: #1 UnitedhealthGrp, #2 UnitedHeathcareSrvcs, #3 UnitedHealthcareInsur, #4 UHCofCalifornia, #5 UHCServicesLLC, #6 UnitedBehavHealthInc, #7 OptumInsight, #8 OptumServicesInc, #9 OptumInc, #10 ViantInc) (jtil) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons. The following error(s) was found: The Summons Requests are blank when opened. Filed documents should be in PDF format when uploaded. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (jtil) |
| Filing 8 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Summons Request,, #2 filed by plaintiff JD Recovery, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons UnitedHealthcare Service Inc., #2 Summons United HealthCare Insurance Company, #3 Summons UHC of California, #4 Summons United HealthCare Services LLC, #5 Summons United Behavioral Health Inc., #6 Summons OptumInsight, #7 Summons Optum Services Inc., #8 Summons Optum Inc., #9 Summons Viant Inc., #10 Summons MultiPlan, Inc.)(Eisenbrey, Damon) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff JD Recovery, LLC, (Eisenbrey, Damon) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JD Recovery, LLC. (Eisenbrey, Damon) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JD Recovery, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons United HealthCare Ins Co, #2 Summons United HealthCare Services Inc, #3 Summons United Healthcare Services LLC, #4 Summons UnitedHealth Group, Inc., #5 Summons Viant Inc., #6 Summons UHC of CA, #7 Summons Optum Inc., #8 Summons Optum Services Inc., #9 Summons OptumInsight, Inc., #10 Summons MultiPlan, Inc.)(Eisenbrey, Damon) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-25425602 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff JD Recovery, LLC. (Attorney Damon D Eisenbrey added to party JD Recovery, LLC(pty:pla))(Eisenbrey, Damon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.