Shahzad Zakir v. T-Mobile USA, Inc et al
Plaintiff: Shahzad Zakir
Defendant: T-Mobile USA, Inc and Does 1-50
Case Number: 8:2020cv00411
Filed: February 28, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John D Early
Referring Judge: James V Selna
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 17, 2020 Filing 14 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Supplemental filed by Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc identifying T-Mobile USA, Inc., a Delaware corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of T-Mobile US, Inc., a Delaware corporation. T-Mobile US, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Daryanani, Jonesh)
April 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER RE SCHEDULING DATES by Judge James V. Selna: The Court has read and considered the parties Rule 26(f) Report and sets the following dates: Jury Trial March 30, 2021 at 8:30 a.m. Final PreTrial Conference March 15, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. Discovery Cut-off December 16, 2021. Expert Discovery Cut-off February 26, 2021. Law and Motion Cut-off February 8, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. The Court orders that any settlement discussions shall be completed not later than December 11, 2020. (See document for further details and deadlines.) (es)
April 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER FOR JURY TRIAL SETTING DATES; PREPARATION FOR TRIAL; AND GOVERNING ATTORNEY AND PARTY CONDUCT AT TRIAL before Judge James V. Selna. (See Document for Details and Deadlines) (lb)
March 23, 2020 Filing 11 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5-9 days, filed by Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc.. (Ripke, Jill)
March 9, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE OF SERVICE OF COURTS INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA filed by Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. (Daryanani, Jonesh)
March 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference set for 4/6/2020 at 11:00 am before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by 3/30/2020. (lb)
March 4, 2020 Filing 8 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb)
March 3, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
March 3, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (et)
March 2, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE Demand for Jury Trial filed by Plaintiff Shahzad Zakir. an individual (Campbell, Paul)
March 2, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Shahzad Zakir. an individual (Campbell, Paul)
February 28, 2020 CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants T-Mobile USA, Inc., Does 1-50, filed by Plaintiff Shahzad Zakir. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 1/22/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 . (et)
February 28, 2020 PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Executed by Plaintiff Shahzad Zakir, upon Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc served on 1/29/2020, answer due 2/19/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Lynanne Gares, Litigation Management Services Leader-CSC-Person Authorized Accept in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 2/10/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT B AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 . (et)
February 28, 2020 NON-CONFORMED ANSWER TO COMPLAINT filed by Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. [SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT I TO AS ATTACHMENT NO. I TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 . (et)
February 28, 2020 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. (Daryanani, Jonesh)
February 28, 2020 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc, identifying Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Plaintiff Shahzad Zakir. (Daryanani, Jonesh)
February 28, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2020-01126180 with filing fee previously paid ($400 paid on 02/28/2020, receipt number 25554064), filed by Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jill Ripke, #2 Declaration of Latisha Moss) (Attorney Jonesh G Daryanani added to party T-Mobile USA, Inc(pty:dft))(Daryanani, Jonesh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shahzad Zakir v. T-Mobile USA, Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shahzad Zakir
Represented By: Paul Andrew Campbell
Represented By: Stephen W Hogie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T-Mobile USA, Inc
Represented By: Jonesh G Daryanani
Represented By: Jill Louise Ripke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-50
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?