Jose Martinez v. Airport Terminal Services, Inc. et al
| Jose Martinez |
| Airport Terminal Services, Inc. and Does 1 through 20, inclusive |
| 8:2020cv00426 |
| March 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5-7 days, filed by Defendant Airport Terminal Services, Inc... (Bacio, Carlos) |
| Filing 12 DECLARATION of Carlos Bacio re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 Re: (1) Filing of Notice of Removal and Notice to Clerk in the Orange County Superior Court and Service of Notice of Removal on Plaintiff; and (2) Filing of Proof of Service filed by Defendant Airport Terminal Services, Inc.. (Bacio, Carlos) |
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge David O. Carter. Scheduling Conference set for 5/11/2020 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (kd)
|
| Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (rrp) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (car) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Airport Terminal Services, Inc. Submitted with Attachment 2 to Notice of Removal #1 .(car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Executed by Plaintiff Jose Martinez, upon Defendant Airport Terminal Services, Inc. served on 1/30/2020, answer due 2/20/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation system, Agent, Received by Carlos Paz, Intake Specialist in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. Filed with Exhibit A pg. 19 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Airport Terminal Services, Inc., Does 1 through 20, inclusive. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Jose Martinez. Filed in State Court on 12/30/19 Submitted with Exhibit A PG 23 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) Modified on 3/5/2020 (car). |
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Airport Terminal Services, Inc. (Bacio, Carlos) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Airport Terminal Services, Inc., (Bacio, Carlos) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Airport Terminal Services, Inc.. (Bacio, Carlos) |
| Filing 4 DECLARATION of Mark Lovell re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Airport Terminal Services, Inc.. (Bacio, Carlos) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Brandy Wallace re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Airport Terminal Services, Inc.. (Bacio, Carlos) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Airport Terminal Services, Inc.. (Bacio, Carlos) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2019-01121035-CU-WT-CJC Receipt No: ACACDC-25578628 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Airport Terminal Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Answer to Complaint) (Attorney Carlos Bacio added to party Airport Terminal Services, Inc.(pty:dft))(Bacio, Carlos) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
