Bryan Williams v. Michael Cogan et al
Plaintiff: Bryan Williams
Defendant: Van Zee Design, Jean Cogan, Michael Cogan and Does 1-10, inclusive
Case Number: 8:2020cv00467
Filed: March 9, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Autumn D Spaeth
Referring Judge: Josephine L Staton
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 16, 2020 Filing 17 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Van Zee Design answer now due 5/12/2020, filed by plaintiff Bryan Williams.(Cornell, Ross)
April 11, 2020 Filing 16 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Jean Cogan answer now due 5/4/2020; Michael Cogan answer now due 5/4/2020, filed by plaintiff Bryan Williams.(Cornell, Ross)
April 1, 2020 Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams, upon Defendant Van Zee Design served on 3/24/2020, answer due 4/14/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Van Zee Design Interiors by Melissa Van Zee in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross)
March 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Josephine L. Staton: On 3/18/2020, Plaintiff voluntarily withdrew that claim. (Doc. #11 .) Accordingly, the Court DISCHARGES the Order to Show Cause. (jp)
March 26, 2020 Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams, upon Defendant Michael Cogan served on 3/21/2020, answer due 4/13/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Michael Cogan by Jean Cogan, Wife in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross)
March 19, 2020 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams, upon Defendant Jean Cogan served on 3/14/2020, answer due 4/6/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jean Cogan in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross)
March 18, 2020 Filing 11 WITHDRAWAL of, Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams. (Cornell, Ross)
March 14, 2020 Filing 10 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (tg)
March 14, 2020 Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (tg)
March 10, 2020 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Jean Cogan, Michael Cogan, Van Zee Design. (et)
March 10, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
March 10, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (et)
March 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION by Judge Josephine L. Staton: Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause, in writing, no later than ten (10) days from the date of this Order, why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION). (jp)
March 9, 2020 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Bryan Williams. (Cornell, Ross)
March 9, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams, (Cornell, Ross)
March 9, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams. (Cornell, Ross)
March 9, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-25654060 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Bryan Williams. (Attorney Ross Cornell added to party Bryan Williams(pty:pla))(Cornell, Ross)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bryan Williams v. Michael Cogan et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Van Zee Design
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jean Cogan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Cogan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bryan Williams
Represented By: Ross Cornell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?