Flectat Limited v. Wilkins Melian et al
| Flectat Limited |
| Wilkins Melian, Brian David Flucht, Artemis Group, LLC, D/B/A Artemis Defense Institute, Sandy E. Sunu Lieberman, Steven D. Lieberman, Prado Family Shooting Range, Inc., D/B/A Prado Olympic Shooting Park, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Artemis Group, LLC, Prado Family Shooting Range, Inc., Artemis Group, LLC doing business as Artemis Defense Institute and Prado Family Shooting Range, Inc. doing business as Prado Olympic Shooting Park |
| 8:2020cv00491 |
| March 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John D Early |
| James V Selna |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Brian David Flucht, identifying Brian David Flucht. (Morris, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Demand for Jury Trial filed by Defendant Brian David Flucht.(Attorney Jeffrey Michael Morris added to party Brian David Flucht(pty:dft))(Morris, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE Notice of Interested Parties Per Local Rule 7.1-1 filed by Defendant Artemis Group, LLC, Sandy E. Sunu Lieberman, Steven D. Lieberman. (Taormina, Cosmo) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #8 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (es) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Artemis Group, LLC, Sandy E. Sunu Lieberman, Steven D. Lieberman.(Attorney Cosmo A Taormina added to party Artemis Group, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Cosmo A Taormina added to party Sandy E. Sunu Lieberman(pty:dft), Attorney Cosmo A Taormina added to party Steven D. Lieberman(pty:dft))(Taormina, Cosmo) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Artemis Group, LLC, Brian David Flucht, Sandy E. Sunu Lieberman, Steven D. Lieberman, Wilkins Melian and Prado Family Shooting Range, Inc. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Flectat Limited. (Attachments: #1 Summons Request, #2 Summons Request, #3 Summons Request, #4 Summons Request, #5 Summons Request)(Welde, Susan) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement and CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Flectat Limited, identifying Canopius Holdings UK Limited. (Welde, Susan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Flectat Limited. (Welde, Susan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-25700354 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Flectat Limited. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney Susan J Welde added to party Flectat Limited(pty:pla))(Welde, Susan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
