In re Debtor: Hoag Urgent Care Tustin, Inc.
| Dr. Robert Amster, Your Neighborhood Urgent Care, LLC and Dr. Robert Amster, M.D., Inc. |
| Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian and Newport Healthcare Center, LLC |
| Hoag Urgent Care Tustin, Inc. |
| 8:2020cv00511 |
| March 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE REGARDING APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. The appeal has been assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Refer to the Notice for specifics. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERRAL OF APPEAL (ADVERSARY) prepared by the United States Bankruptcy Court on 3/11/2020. (jtil) |
Filing 1
NOTICE OF APPEAL filed by Appellants Your Neighborhood Urgent Care, LLC, Dr. Robert Amster, M.D., Inc., and Dr. Robert Amster Re: Order Granting Hoag Parties' Motion to Strike Untimely Jury Demands entered on 10/11/2019 by Bankruptcy Judge Theodore C. Albert, filed in the Bankruptcy Court on 3/6/2020. Bankruptcy Court case number: 8:20-cv-00511-MWF, Adversary number: 8:17- ap-01230-TA, BAP case number: N/A. (Attachments: #1 BK Docket) (jtil)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
