Kurtis Kooiman v. Siwell, Inc. et al
Kurtis Kooiman |
Siwell, Inc., d.b.a. Capital Mortgage Services of Texas, Siwell, Inc., Does 1 through 50, inclusive and Siwell, Inc. doing business as Capital Mortgage Services of Texas |
8:2020cv00565 |
March 20, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Douglas F McCormick |
Josephine L Staton |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Rule 26f Joint Report REPORT of Rule 26f Joint Report filed by Plaintiff Kurtis Kooiman. (Plazak, Douglas) |
Filing 13 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Scheduling Conference is set for 5/29/2020 at 10:30 a.m. See attached Order for details. (tg) |
Filing 12 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Josephine L. Staton: On the Court's own motion, the hearing re Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(B)(3) #11 , is ordered CONTINUED from 5/8/2020 to 6/26/2020 at 10:30 a.m. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tg) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(B)(3) filed by Defendant Siwell, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 5/8/2020 at 10:30 AM before Judge Josephine L. Staton. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Proposed Order) (Smith, Nathan) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Siwell, Inc., re Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) #9 served on 03/26/2020. (Smith, Nathan) |
Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Siwell, Inc. answer now due 4/10/2020, filed by Defendant Siwell, Inc..(Smith, Nathan) |
Filing 8 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Siwell, Inc.. (Smith, Nathan) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Attachment 1 Civil Cover Sheet should be e-filed separately and in the correct event. The correct event is located under Civil Events Other Filings Miscellaneous Filings. (car) |
Filing 6 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (tg) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (car) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Siwell, Inc., filed by Plaintiff Kurtis Kooiman. Filed in state Court on 2/11/2020 Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
Filing 3 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Siwell, Inc., d.b.a. Capital Mortgage Services of Texas, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #2 served on March 20, 2020. (Smith, Nathan) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Siwell, Inc., d.b.a. Capital Mortgage Services of Texas, identifying Capital Mortgage. (Smith, Nathan) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Orange, case number 30-2020-01131287-CU-BC-CJC Receipt No: ACACDC-25800837 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Siwell, Inc., d.b.a. Capital Mortgage Services of Texas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Docket, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Nathan Frederick Jones Smith added to party Siwell, Inc., d.b.a. Capital Mortgage Services of Texas(pty:dft))(Smith, Nathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.