Robert Cohen v. Conagra Brands, Inc.
| Robert Cohen |
| Conagra Brands, Inc. |
| 8:2020cv00637 |
| April 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter, Granting Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer (More than 30 days) #13 . Defendant Conagra Brands, Inc. answer due 6/8/2020. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (twdb)
|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to June 8, 2020 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Conagra Brands, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lowe, Rachel) |
| Filing 12 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Conagra Brands, Inc. answer now due 5/24/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Conagra Brands, Inc..(Attorney Rachel E K Lowe added to party Conagra Brands, Inc.(pty:dft))(Lowe, Rachel) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: Granting #10 Non-Resident Attorney Gretchen M. Elsner APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Robert Cohen, Plaintiff, designating Marc L. Godino as local counsel. (twdb)
|
| Filing 10 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Gretchen M. Elsner to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Robert Cohen (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-26005501) filed by Plaintiff Robert Cohen. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Godino, Marc) |
| Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kd) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Gretchen Elsner. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Conagra Brands, Inc. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Robert Cohen, (Godino, Marc) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Robert Cohen. (Godino, Marc) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Robert Cohen. (Godino, Marc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-25938685 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Robert Cohen. (Attachments: #1 CLRA Venue Declaration of Plaintiff Robert Cohen) (Attorney Marc L Godino added to party Robert Cohen(pty:pla))(Godino, Marc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
