Richard Baumrind v. Shredz Supplements, LLC
Plaintiff: Richard Baumrind
Defendant: Shredz Supplements, LLC
Case Number: 8:2020cv00645
Filed: April 2, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Karen E Scott
Referring Judge: James V Selna
Nature of Suit: Constitutional - State Statute
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 28, 2020 Filing 13 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendant Shredz Supplements, LLC, identifying none. (Olsen, John)
May 28, 2020 Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by defendant Shredz Supplements, LLC.(Attorney John F Olsen added to party Shredz Supplements, LLC(pty:dft))(Olsen, John)
May 15, 2020 Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Richard Baumrind, upon Defendant Shredz Supplements, LLC served on 5/7/2020, answer due 5/28/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Arvin Lal, CEO in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Kazerounian, Seyed)
April 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge James V. Selna. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 6/29/2020. Scheduling Conference set for 7/6/2020 at 10:30 am before Judge James V. Selna. (lb)
April 6, 2020 Filing 9 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb)
April 6, 2020 Filing 8 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb)
April 3, 2020 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Shredz Supplements, LLC. (car)
April 3, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
April 3, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (car)
April 2, 2020 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Richard Baumrind. (Kazerounian, Seyed)
April 2, 2020 Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Richard Baumrind, (Kazerounian, Seyed)
April 2, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Richard Baumrind. (Kazerounian, Seyed)
April 2, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-25950811 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Richard Baumrind. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Seyed Abbas Kazerounian added to party Richard Baumrind(pty:pla))(Kazerounian, Seyed)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Richard Baumrind v. Shredz Supplements, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shredz Supplements, LLC
Represented By: John F Olsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Baumrind
Represented By: Seyed Abbas Kazerounian
Represented By: Nicholas Barthel
Represented By: Yana A Hart
Represented By: David J McGlothlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?