Richard Baumrind v. Shredz Supplements, LLC
Richard Baumrind |
Shredz Supplements, LLC |
8:2020cv00645 |
April 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Karen E Scott |
James V Selna |
Constitutional - State Statute |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendant Shredz Supplements, LLC, identifying none. (Olsen, John) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by defendant Shredz Supplements, LLC.(Attorney John F Olsen added to party Shredz Supplements, LLC(pty:dft))(Olsen, John) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Richard Baumrind, upon Defendant Shredz Supplements, LLC served on 5/7/2020, answer due 5/28/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Arvin Lal, CEO in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Kazerounian, Seyed) |
Filing 10 ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge James V. Selna. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 6/29/2020. Scheduling Conference set for 7/6/2020 at 10:30 am before Judge James V. Selna. (lb) |
Filing 9 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) |
Filing 8 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Shredz Supplements, LLC. (car) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (car) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Richard Baumrind. (Kazerounian, Seyed) |
Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Richard Baumrind, (Kazerounian, Seyed) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Richard Baumrind. (Kazerounian, Seyed) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-25950811 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Richard Baumrind. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Seyed Abbas Kazerounian added to party Richard Baumrind(pty:pla))(Kazerounian, Seyed) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Richard Baumrind v. Shredz Supplements, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Shredz Supplements, LLC | |
Represented By: | John F Olsen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Richard Baumrind | |
Represented By: | Seyed Abbas Kazerounian |
Represented By: | Nicholas Barthel |
Represented By: | Yana A Hart |
Represented By: | David J McGlothlin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.