Sloane Angell v. Realty One Group, Inc.
| Sloane Angell |
| Realty One Group, Inc. |
| 8:2020cv00652 |
| April 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| John D Early |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3-5 days, filed by Plaintiff Sloane Angell.. (Kaufman, Rachel) |
Filing 12
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge David O. Carter. Scheduling Conference set for 6/15/2020 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (See attached Order for complete details.) (kd)
|
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Realty One Group, Inc., identifying REALTY ONE GROUP, INC., a California corporation. (Price, Benjamin) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Realty One Group, Inc..(Attorney Benjamin Lloyd Price added to party Realty One Group, Inc.(pty:dft))(Price, Benjamin) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Sloane Angell, upon Defendant Realty One Group, Inc. served on 4/14/2020, answer due 5/5/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Kaufman, Rachel) |
| Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kd) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Realty One Group, Inc. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Sloane Angell, (Kaufman, Rachel) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Sloane Angell. (Kaufman, Rachel) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Sloane Angell. (Kaufman, Rachel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-25959839 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Sloane Angell. (Attorney Rachel Kaufman added to party Sloane Angell(pty:pla))(Kaufman, Rachel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sloane Angell v. Realty One Group, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Realty One Group, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Lloyd Price |
| Represented By: | Keith G Bremer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sloane Angell | |
| Represented By: | Rachel Kaufman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
