D. R. et al v. City of Anaheim et al
| D. R. and Christopher Ramirez |
| City of Irvine, City of Anaheim, Nick Bennallack and Does 1-10, inclusive |
| 8:2020cv00659 |
| April 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| John D Early |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 43
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ACTION AS TO THE CITY OF IRVINE #42 by Judge David O. Carter. Each party to bear their own costs and attorney's fees. (lom)
|
| Filing 42 STIPULATION to Dismiss Defendant City of Irvine filed by Defendant City of Irvine. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice of Action as to the City of Irvine)(Spradlin, Daniel) |
| Filing 41 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: Per the parties' Joint Status Report #40 , the Court hereby lifts the discovery stay in this action. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rrp) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 40 STATUS REPORT filed by Defendant City of Anaheim. (Johnson, Moses) |
| Filing 39 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge David O. Carter: Granting #23 Defendants' MOTION For Stay. The case is hereby STAYED through September 4, 2020. On or before September 9, 2020, the parties shall jointly file a status report apprising the Court of the status of the parallel criminal investigation in this matter. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (twdb) |
|
Filing 38
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION by Magistrate Judge John D. Early re Stipulation for Protective Order #37 . [See Order for further details.] (et)
|
| Filing 37 STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Defendants Nick Bennallack, City of Anaheim. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Johnson, Moses) |
|
Filing 36
SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER RE: PRETRIAL AND TRIAL PROCEDURES by Judge David O. Carter. ( Fact Discovery cut-off 3/29/2021., Motions due by 5/24/2021 at 8:30 AM., Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/5/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter., Trial set for 7/20/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter.) SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (twdb)
|
|
Filing 35
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 1 by Judge David O. Carter. Case ordered to Magistrate Judge John D. Early for Settlement Conference. (twdb)
|
| Filing 34 MINUTES OF Scheduling Conference held before Judge David O. Carter. Scheduling Order to be issued. Court Reporter: Katherine M. Stride. (twdb) |
|
Filing 33
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: Granting #32 Plaintiffs' Counsel Marcel F. Sincich Leave to Appear at Scheduling Conference in Lieu of Lead Counsel. (twdb)
|
| Filing 32 REQUEST for Leave of Marcel F. Sincich to Appear for Scheduling Conference filed by Plaintiffs D. R., Christopher Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Sincich, Marcel) |
| Filing 31 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge David O. Carter. The Court finds the Motion to Stay Case pending Discovery Pending Conclusion of Orange County District Attorney's Office Criminal Investigation filed by Defendant Nick Bennallack, City of Anaheim #23 appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The motion is taken under submission. The Scheduling Conference set for JULY 13, 2020, remains as previously set. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kd) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 30 REPLY Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to Stay NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Discovery Pending Conclusion of Orange County District Attorney's Office Criminal Investigation #23 filed by Defendants Nick Bennallack, City of Anaheim. (Johnson, Moses) |
| Filing 29 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Discovery Pending Conclusion of Orange County District Attorney's Office Criminal Investigation #23 filed by Plaintiffs D. R., Christopher Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Marcel F. Sincich)(Sincich, Marcel) |
| Filing 28 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 4-6 days, filed by Plaintiffs D. R., Christopher Ramirez.. (Sincich, Marcel) |
| Filing 27 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR STAY OF DISCOVERY PENDING CONCLUSION OF ORANGE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S INVESTAGATION re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Discovery Pending Conclusion of Orange County District Attorney's Office Criminal Investigation #23 filed by Defendants Nick Bennallack, City of Anaheim. (Johnson, Moses) |
| Filing 26 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Discovery Pending Conclusion of Orange County District Attorney's Office Criminal Investigation #23 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (twdb) |
| Filing 25 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant City of Irvine.(Kraus, Roberta) |
| Filing 24 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge David O. Carter. The Scheduling Conference is continued to 7/13/2020 at 8:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kd) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 23 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Discovery Pending Conclusion of Orange County District Attorney's Office Criminal Investigation filed by Defendant Nick Bennallack, City of Anaheim. Motion set for hearing on 7/13/2020 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit) (Johnson, Moses) |
|
Filing 22
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge David O. Carter. Scheduling Conference set for 6/29/2020 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (See attached Order for complete details.) (kd)
|
| Filing 21 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Daniel K Spradlin counsel for Defendant City of Irvine. Adding DANIEL K. SPRADLIN as counsel of record for CITY OF IRVINE, a public entity for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant CITY OF IRVINE, a public entity. (Attorney Daniel K Spradlin added to party City of Irvine(pty:dft))(Spradlin, Daniel) |
| Filing 20 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant City of Irvine, (Kraus, Roberta) |
| Filing 19 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to City of Irvine answer now due 6/12/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant City of Irvine.(Attorney Roberta A Kraus added to party City of Irvine(pty:dft))(Kraus, Roberta) |
| Filing 18 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Nick Bennallack, City of Anaheim, identifying THE CITY OF ANAHEIM and NICK BENNALLACK. (Johnson, Moses) |
| Filing 17 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Nick Bennallack, City of Anaheim.(Attorney Moses W Johnson, IV added to party Nick Bennallack(pty:dft), Attorney Moses W Johnson, IV added to party City of Anaheim(pty:dft))(Johnson, Moses) |
| Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff D. R., Christopher Ramirez, upon Defendant Nick Bennallack served on 4/28/2020, answer due 5/19/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jane Doe, person authorized to accept service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Sincich, Marcel) |
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff D. R., Christopher Ramirez, upon Defendant City of Anaheim served on 4/21/2020, answer due 5/12/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon City Clerk's Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Sincich, Marcel) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff D. R., Christopher Ramirez, upon Defendant City of Irvine served on 4/22/2020, answer due 5/13/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Steven Clark, Clerk's Office employee in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Sincich, Marcel) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER by Magistrate Judge John D. Early: granting #10 APPLICATION to Appoint Guardian ad Litem. Appointing Vanessa Gonzalez as Guardian ad Litem for D.R. (et)
|
| Filing 12 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kd) |
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendants Nick Bennallack, City of Anaheim, City of Irvine. (twdb) |
| Filing 10 APPLICATION for Appointment of Vanessa Gonzalez as Guardian ad Litem for D.R. filed by Plaintiffs D. R., Christopher Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Consent of Nomination, #2 Declaration Declaration of Vanessa Gonzalez for D.R., #3 Proposed Order) (Galipo, Dale) |
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons, #8 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiffs D. R., Christopher Ramirez. (Sincich, Marcel) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons. The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (esa) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): It appears a guardian ad litem is named in this case but no Petition seeking such appointment has been filed. A Petition for the Appointment of a Guardian Ad Litem must be filed when the appointment of a guardian ad litem is required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(c)(2). See Local Rule 17-1. Counsel must file a Petition for the Appointment of a Guardian Ad Litem immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (esa) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiffs D. R., Christopher Ramirez. (Galipo, Dale) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs D. R., Christopher Ramirez, (Galipo, Dale) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs D. R., Christopher Ramirez. (Galipo, Dale) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-25967502 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs D. R., Christopher Ramirez. (Attorney Dale K Galipo added to party D. R.(pty:pla), Attorney Dale K Galipo added to party Christopher Ramirez(pty:pla))(Galipo, Dale) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
