Erriton Hall v. Suzuki Motor of America, Inc. et al
Erriton Hall |
Suzuki Motor of America, Inc., Suzuki Motor Corporation and Does 1 through 100, Inclusive |
8:2020cv00670 |
April 6, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
David O Carter |
Douglas F McCormick |
Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND OPPOSITION re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Orange County Superior Court #15 filed by Defendant Suzuki Motor of America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice)(Sanders, Justin) |
Filing 15 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Orange County Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Erriton Hall. Motion set for hearing on 6/22/2020 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order to Plaintiff Erriton Hall's Motion to Remand) (Davis, Travis) |
Filing 14 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge David O. Carter. Scheduling Conference set for 6/29/2020 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (See attached Order for complete details.) (kd) |
Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Suzuki Motor of America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Rocio Barbeaux)(Sanders, Justin) |
Filing 12 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge David O. Carter re: Notice of Removal #1 . The defendant's answer is due 5/15/2020. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kd) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 11 DECLARATION Certificate of Service of Supporting Documentation From United States Court filed by Defendant Suzuki Motor of America, Inc.. (Sanders, Justin) |
Filing 10 DECLARATION of CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF NOTICE TO CLERK OF REMOVAL OF ACTION TO FEDERAL COURT filed by Defendant Suzuki Motor of America, Inc.. (Sanders, Justin) |
Filing 9 DECLARATION of Certificate of Service of Notice to Adverse Party filed by Defendant Suzuki Motor of America, Inc.. (Sanders, Justin) |
Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kd) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 100, inclusive, Suzuki Motor Corporation, Suzuki Motor of America, Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Erriton Hall. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 2/7/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Suzuki Motor of America, Inc., identifying Suzuki Motor Corporation, Erriton Hall. (Sanders, Justin) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Suzuki Motor of America, Inc. identifying SUZUKI MOTOR CORPORATION as Corporate Parent. (Sanders, Justin) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Suzuki Motor of America, Inc.. (Sanders, Justin) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Suzuki Motor of America, Inc.. (Sanders, Justin) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from orange county, case number 30-2020-01130663-CU-PL-CJC Receipt No: CCACDC-25987888 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Suzuki Motor of America, Inc.. (Attorney Justin H Sanders added to party Suzuki Motor of America, Inc.(pty:dft))(Sanders, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.