Evanston Insurance Company v. Footprints Behavioral Interventions, Inc.
Evanston Insurance Company, an Illinois corporation |
Footprints Behavioral Interventions, Inc. |
8:2020cv00682 |
April 8, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Karen E Scott |
James V Selna |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by plaintiff Evanston Insurance Company, an Illinois corporation. (Perlis, Michael) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Evanston Insurance Company, an Illinois corporation, identifying Evanston Insurance Company, Markel Corporation, Footprints Behavioral Interventions, Inc., Footprints Behavioral Health Corp.. (Perlis, Michael) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Evanston Insurance Company, an Illinois corporation. (Perlis, Michael) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Evanston Insurance Company, an Illinois corporation. (Perlis, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26013641 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Evanston Insurance Company, an Illinois corporation. (Attorney Michael F Perlis added to party Evanston Insurance Company, an Illinois corporation(pty:pla))(Perlis, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.