Parity Networks, LLC v. Moxa Inc. et al
| Parity Networks, LLC |
| Moxa Americas, Inc. and Moxa Inc. |
| 8:2020cv00698 |
| April 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen E Scott |
| James V Selna |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 26
ORDER Granting Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer #25 , Defendant Moxa Americas, Inc. answer due 6/29/2020 by Judge James V. Selna. (es)
|
| Filing 25 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 06/29/2020 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Moxa Americas, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Robert E Freitas added to party Moxa Americas, Inc.(pty:dft))(Freitas, Robert) |
|
Filing 24
Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference set for 07/06/2020 at 11:30 am before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by 6/30/2020. (lb)
|
| Filing 23 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Parity Networks, LLC, upon Defendant Moxa Americas, Inc. served on 4/24/2020, answer due 5/15/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Emanuel Del Gado, Acting Manager in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (DiNovo, Andrew) |
|
Filing 22
ORDER by Judge James V. Selna: GRANTING #18 Non-Resident Attorney Daniel L. Schmid APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Parity Networks, LLC, designating Stephen M. Lobbin as local counsel. (es)
|
|
Filing 21
ORDER by Judge James V. Selna: GRANTING #17 Non-Resident Attorney Adam G. Price APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Parity Networks, LLC, designating Stephen M. Lobbin as local counsel. (es)
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER by Judge James V. Selna: GRANTING #16 Non-Resident Attorney Andrew G. DiNovo APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Parity Networks, LLC, designating Stephen M. Lobbin as local counsel. (es)
|
| Filing 19 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) |
| Filing 18 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Daniel L. Schmid to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Parity Networks, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-26089629) filed by Plaintiff Parity Networks, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Lobbin, Stephen) |
| Filing 17 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Adam G. Price to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Parity Networks, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-26089628) filed by Plaintiff Parity Networks, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Lobbin, Stephen) |
| Filing 16 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Andrew G. DiNovo to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Parity Networks, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-26089625) filed by Plaintiff Parity Networks, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Lobbin, Stephen) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Parity Networks, LLC. Related Case(s): 8:20-00697, 8:20-cv-00699 (Lobbin, Stephen) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 8:20-cv-00697-JVS-KES. Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth and Judge Josephine L. Staton to Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:20-cv-00698-JVS-KES. Signed by Judge James V. Selna. (rrp)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Daniel L Schmid on behalf of Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Adam G Price on behalf of Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Andrew G DiNovo on behalf of Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Moxa Americas, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Moxa Inc. (et) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (et) |
| Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Parity Networks, LLC. (Lobbin, Stephen) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Parity Networks, LLC. (Lobbin, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Parity Networks, LLC, identifying Auto Technology, Inc.. (Lobbin, Stephen) |
| Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Parity Networks, LLC. (Lobbin, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Parity Networks, LLC. (Lobbin, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26035913 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Parity Networks, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (Attorney Stephen M Lobbin added to party Parity Networks, LLC(pty:pla))(Lobbin, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
