James Rutherford v. Red Mountain Asset Fund I, LLC et al
JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual and James Rutherford |
DOES 1-10 Inclusive, RED MOUNTAIN ASSET FUND I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Does 1-10, inclusive and Red Mountain Asset Fund I, LLC |
8:2020cv00706 |
April 10, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Autumn D Spaeth |
Josephine L Staton |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Scheduling Conference is set for 7/10/2020 at 10:30 a.m. See attached Order for details. (tg) |
Filing 15 Defendant's NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Red Mountain Asset Fund I, LLC, (Finnerty, Kathleen) |
Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Red Mountain Asset Fund I, LLC.(Attorney Kathleen E Finnerty added to party Red Mountain Asset Fund I, LLC (pty:dft))(Finnerty, Kathleen) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Red Mountain Asset Fund I, LLC served on 5/10/2020, answer due 6/1/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 12 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DECLINING Supplemental Jurisdiction and DISMISSING State-Law Claim Without Prejudice by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim, and the claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to filing in state court. (jp) |
Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff James Rutherfordto Order to Show Cause, #10 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of JRM, #2 Declaration of Rutherford)(Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 10 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION by Judge Josephine L. Staton: Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause, in writing, no later thanten (10) days from the date of this Order, why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION). (jp) |
Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (tg) |
Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (tg) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Red Mountain Asset Fund I, LLC. (car) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (car) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 2 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual, (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26043843 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual(pty:pla))(Manning, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.