Alicia Marie Richards v. Orange County Superior Court et al
| Alicia Marie Richards |
| Honorable Andrew De La Cruz and Orange County Superior Court |
| 8:2020cv00768 |
| April 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee: denying #18 MOTION for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis. (mat)
|
| Filing 21 NOTIFICATION from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of case number assigned and briefing schedule. Appeal Docket No. 20-55596 assigned to Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #19 as to plaintiff Alicia Marie Richards. Received 6/17/2020. (es) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th CCA filed by plaintiff Alicia Marie Richards. Appeal of Order on Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60), #7 , Order on Motion to Alter Judgment, #12 , Order, Terminated Case, #8 , Order on Motion to Alter Judgment, #17 Filed On: 4/21/18, 5/11/20 and 5/26/20; Entered On: 4/21/18, 5/12/20 and 5/26/20; In forma pauperis is pending. (mat) |
| Filing 18 MOTION and Affidavit for Permission to Proceed for In Forma Pauperis on Appeal, filed by plaintiff Alicia Marie Richards. (mat) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER DENYING SECOND MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND ORDER #13 by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court's Order was not erroneous. Plaintiff has presented no basis for Rule 59(e) or Rule 60(b) relief. The Motion is therefore DENIED. Plaintiff is warned that further filing of motions to reconsider based on substantially similar arguments will be summarily denied and subject her to sanctions. See Local Rule 11-9. (See order for details.) (es)
|
| Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL filed by Plaintiff Alicia Marie Richards, re Ex Parte Application for Order to Extend of Time to File Appeal on the Orders of 4/21/2020 and 5/11/2020, Memorandum of Points and Authorities #14 ; Declaration in Support of Ex Parte Application #15 ; Proposed Order served on 5/20/2020. (gk) |
| Filing 15 DECLARATION in Support of Ex Parte Application for Order to Extend the Time to File Appeal #14 filed by Plaintiff Alicia Marie Richards. (gk) |
| Filing 14 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order Granting Extension of Time to File Appeal on the Court's Order Summarily Dismissing Case, etc. dated 4/21/2020 #7 , #8 , and Its Order Denying Motion to Alter or Amend dated 5/11/2020 #12 ; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Application filed by Plaintiff Alicia Marie Richards. (gk) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Alter or Amend Order on Denying Temporary Restraining Order, Denying Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, and Summarily Dismissing Case #7 , #8 and Order Denying Motion to Alter or Amend Filed 5/11/2020 #12 filed by Plaintiff Alicia Marie Richards. Motion set for hearing on 6/19/2020 at 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (gk) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND ORDER #9 by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court's Order was not erroneous. Plaintiff has presented no basis for Rule 59(e) or Rule 60(b) relief. The Motion is accordingly DENIED. (See order for details.) (es)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Per Judge Douglas F. McCormick's request, this case shall be re-designated as a 194 case. Reference to the discovery Magistrate Judge is hereby vacated. The above case is referred to a Magistrate Judge pursuant to General Order 05-07 for a Report and Recommendation. All documents subsequently filed in this case must reflect the case number: 8:20-cv-00768 DMG (DFM). (rrp) |
|
Filing 10
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee. the Court refers Plaintiff's motion to alter or amend order denying temporary restraining order, denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and summarily dismissing case #9 to Magistrate Judge McCormick for recommendation. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Alter or Amend Order Denying Temporary Restraining Order, Denying Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, and Summarily Dismissing Case #7 , #8 filed by Plaintiff Alicia Marie Richards. Motion set for hearing on 6/5/2020 at 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (gk) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER DENYING TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, AND SUMMARILY DISMISSING CASE by Judge Dolly M. Gee: It is apparent from the Complaint and its allegations that Plaintiff seeks to impose liability for acts taken by Judge De La Cruz or other judicial officers in their judicial capacity. Because Plaintiff seeks relief and alleges injuries that would require this Court to sit in appellate jurisdiction over the state court, her claims are barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. Plaintiff also appears to seek a Temporary Restraining Order ("TRO"). "A plaintiff seeking a preliminary injunction must establish that he is likely to succeed on the merits, that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief, that the balance of equities tips in his favor, and that an injunction is in the public interest." Plaintiff has failed to show she is likely to succeed on the merits for the reasons stated above. Because Plaintiff seeks to sue a party who is immune from suit and her claim appears to be barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis #3 and orders the case be summarily dismissed. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (gk)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Denying #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is hereby DISMISSED immediately. IT WAS RECOMMENDED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be DENIED by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. Reasons: Legally and/or factually patently frivolous. Immunity as to named defendant. See Order Denying Temporary Restraining Order, Denying Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, and Summarily Dismissing Case. (gk)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (esa) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by plaintiff Alicia Marie Richards. (esa) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Alicia Marie Richards. (esa) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by plaintiff Alicia Marie Richards. (esa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR TEMPO0RARY RESTRAINING ORDER against defendants Andrew De La Cruz, Orange County Superior Court.Case assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick, filed by plaintiff Alicia Marie Richards. (Attachments: #1 CV71) (esa) Modified on 4/20/2020 (esa). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
