Thomas D. Curry v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Thomas D Curry and Thomas D. Curry |
| Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 8:2020cv00794 |
| April 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Thomas D. Curry, upon Defendant Commissioner of Social Security Administration served on 5/4/2020, answer due 9/1/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to F DelaRosa. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Emily Sase. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to unknown. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Monge, Troy) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver for all further proceedings. Please use the case number SACV20-794 RAO on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Attorney Amanda Schapel added to party Commissioner of Social Security Administration(pty:dft))(Schapel, Amanda) |
Filing 8
ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. Plaintiff will promptly serve the summons and complaint on the government in accordance with Rule 4(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff will file an appropriate proof of service within 30 days of the date of this Order. Government counsel must file a notice of appearance within 30 days of service of the action. (see document for further details) (hr)
|
| Filing 7 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Thomas D. Curry. (Monge, Troy) |
| Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and referred to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiff Thomas D Curry. (Monge, Troy) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Thomas D Curry, (Monge, Troy) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Thomas D Curry. (Monge, Troy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26211956 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Thomas D Curry. (Attorney Troy Dana Monge added to party Thomas D Curry(pty:pla))(Monge, Troy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
