Ariel Hall-Jones v. Golden State Credit Service, Inc.
| ARIEL HALL-JONES |
| GOLDEN STATE CREDIT SERVICE, INC. |
| 8:2020cv00888 |
| May 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Golden State Credit Service, Inc. filed by Plaintiff Ariel Hall-Jones. Request set for hearing on 1/8/2021 at 10:30 AM before Judge Josephine L. Staton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of Service) (Wick, Previn) |
Filing 11
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than 7/10/2020, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (See document for further information). (jp)
|
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Ariel Hall-Jones, upon Defendant Golden State Credit Service, Inc. served on 6/13/2020, answer due 7/6/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (Wick, Previn) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Golden State Credit Service, Inc. (jp) |
| Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Ariel Hall-Jones. (Wick, Previn) |
| Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Ariel Hall-Jones. (Wick, Previn) |
| Filing 6 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (tg) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (esa) |
| Filing 3 Plaintiff's CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff ARIEL HALL-JONES, (Wick, Previn) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff ARIEL HALL-JONES. (Wick, Previn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26423017 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff ARIEL HALL-JONES. (Attorney Previn A Wick added to party ARIEL HALL-JONES(pty:pla))(Wick, Previn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ariel Hall-Jones v. Golden State Credit Service, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: GOLDEN STATE CREDIT SERVICE, INC. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ARIEL HALL-JONES | |
| Represented By: | Previn A Wick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
