Dwaine K Dirks v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
Dwaine K Dirks |
Citibank, N.A., CitiMortgage, Inc., Cenlar and DOES 1 to 10 |
8:2020cv00911 |
May 15, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John D Early |
Josephine L Staton |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ORDER GRANTING Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint By 21 Days #17 by Judge Josephine L. Staton that: Citi's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is extended by 21 days until 7/23/2020. (jp) |
Filing 17 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Citibank, N.A. answer now due 7/23/2020; CitiMortgage, Inc. answer now due 7/23/2020, re Summons Request #13 filed by Defendants Citibank, N.A.; CitiMortgage, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Wyatt, Kyla) |
Filing 16 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint #12 as to Defendants CitiMortgage, Inc., Citibank, N.A., Cenlar, FSB. (jp) |
Filing 15 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Dwaine K Dirks, (Engstrom, Carl) |
Filing 14 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Dwaine K Dirks. (Engstrom, Carl) |
Filing 13 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition, #12 filed by plaintiff Dwaine K Dirks. (Engstrom, Carl) |
Filing 12 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Plaintiffs amending Complaint - (Discovery) JURY DEMAND, filed by plaintiff Dwaine K Dirks (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9)(Engstrom, Carl) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendants CitiMortgage, Inc., Citibank, N.A., re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 Notice to Adverse Party and to Court of Removal to Federal Court served on May 15, 2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Ntc to Adverse Party and to Court of Removal to Federal Court)(Wyatt, Kyla) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Citibank, N.A. answer now due 6/19/2020; CitiMortgage, Inc. answer now due 6/19/2020, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Citibank, N.A.; CitiMortgage, Inc..(Wyatt, Kyla) |
Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (tg) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (jtil) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Citibank, N.A., CitiMortgage, Inc., Cenlar in Los Angeles Superior Court on 2/21/2020, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendants CitiMortgage, Inc., Citibank, N.A. (Wyatt, Kyla) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants CitiMortgage, Inc., Citibank, N.A., (Wyatt, Kyla) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants CitiMortgage, Inc., Citibank, N.A.. (Wyatt, Kyla) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2020-01127960 Receipt No: ACACDC-26461535 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants Citibank, N.A., CitiMortgage, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Summons and Complaint) (Attorney Kyla Wyatt added to party CitiMortgage, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Kyla Wyatt added to party Citibank, N.A.(pty:dft))(Wyatt, Kyla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.