Karla Godinez v. Merritt Hospitality, LLC
KARLA GODINEZ |
Merritt Hospitality, LLC and DOES 1-50, inclusive |
8:2020cv00941 |
May 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
David O Carter |
Karen E Scott |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Amended Complaint/Petition #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 19-1 Complaint/Petition includes more than 10 Does or fictitiously named parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (twdb) |
Filing 11 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against DEFENDANT All Defendants amending Complaint - (Discovery) JURY DEMAND, filed by Plaintiff Karla Godinez(Jackson, Armond) |
Filing 10 ORDER ON STIPULATION TO PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO FILE FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT #9 by Judge David O. Carter. Plaintiff is granted leave to file the First Amended Complaint to revise the class definition to exclude employees of Defendant working at the Warner Center Marriott and the Hilton Santa Cruz/Scotts Valley, add additional sub-classes, and a claim under the California Private Attorneys General Act. Defendant's answer to the Complaint shall be deemed its response to the First Amended Complaint. (lom) |
Filing 9 First STIPULATION to AMEND Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant MERRITT HOSPITALITY, LLC Merritt Hospitality, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Fuchsman, Jeffrey) |
Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kd) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (jtil) |
NON CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Merritt Hospitality, LLC, attached as Exhibit B. (jtil) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Karla Godinez in Orange County Superior Court on 1/29/2020, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2020-01127848-CU-OE-CXC Receipt No: ACACDC-26565294 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant MERRITT HOSPITALITY, LLC Merritt Hospitality, LLC. (Attorney Jeffrey P Fuchsman added to party Merritt Hospitality, LLC(pty:dft))(Fuchsman, Jeffrey) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: A case-initiating document was submitted without payment of the full filing fee. Within two business days of this notice, counsel must pay the filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis;otherwise, the docket for this case number will be closed and no further filings will be permitted under this case number. The filing fee may be paid online by docketing the event Pay Filing Fee. (jtil) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by Defendant MERRITT HOSPITALITY, LLC Merritt Hospitality, LLC. (Fuchsman, Jeffrey) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Merritt Hospitality, LLC. (Fuchsman, Jeffrey) |
Filing 1 NOTICE NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant MERRITT HOSPITALITY, LLC Merritt Hospitality, LLC. (Fuchsman, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.