Mordechai Rubin v. SCBH Laboratory LLC et al
| Mordechai Rubin and Michael Rubin |
| Charles McPhail, SCBH Laboratory LLC, Andre McPhail, Does 1 through 10 and SCBH Laboratory LLC doing business as SCBH LLC |
| 8:2020cv00944 |
| May 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 26
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiff's, to show cause in writing no later than 7/21/2020, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (See document for further information). (jp)
|
|
Filing 25
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mordechai Rubin, upon Defendant SCBH Laboratory LLC served on 6/23/2020, answer due 7/14/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Charles McPhail, Agent for Service of Process for SCBH Laboratory LLC d/b/a SCBH LLC in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Harney, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 24
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mordechai Rubin, upon Defendant Charles McPhail served on 6/23/2020, answer due 7/14/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Charles McPhail in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Harney, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 23
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mordechai Rubin, upon Defendant Andre McPhail served on 6/18/2020, answer due 7/9/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Andre McPhail in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Harney, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 22
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DIVERSITY JURISDICTION (Doc. #19 ) by Judge Josephine L. Staton. On June 22, 2020, the Court ordered Plaintiff Mordechai Rubin to show cause why the Court should not dismiss this case due to a lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. (OSC, Doc. #19 .) Plaintiff timely filed a response. (Doc. #21 .) In light of that response, the Court DISCHARGES the Order to Show Cause. (lom)
|
|
Filing 21
RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Mordechai Rubinto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, #19 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harney, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER GRANTING Request for Special Appointment to Serve Process Under FRCP 4.1(a) (Doc. #12 ) by Judge Josephine L. Staton. (See document for further information). (jp)
|
|
Filing 19
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DIVERSITY JURISDICTION by Judge Josephine L. Staton: Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause, in writing, no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order, why this case should not be dismissed due to a lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. Failure to timely or adequately respond will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. (see document for further details) (bm)
|
|
Filing 18
21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Andre McPhail, Charles McPhail, SCBH Laboratory LLC. (lh)
|
|
Filing 17
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order Denying Ex Parte Applications (Dkts. 5-8) by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: Before the Court is Plaintiffs Ex Parte Application for Writ of Attachment and Temporary Protective Order against the Defendants. See Dkts. 5 (Andre), 6 (Charles), 7 (SCBH) (collectively, the "Applications"). The Applications are supported by a Memorandum ("Memorandum"), the Declaration of Rubin ("Rubin Decl."), the Declaration of Christopher J. Haney, Plaintiffs counsel ("Haney Decl."), and a Request for Judicial Notice ("RJN"), consisting of documents filed in SCBH's bankruptcy case. See Dkts. 8-11. Plaintiffs asks the Court to issue a Right to Attach Order and Order for Issuance of a Writ of Attachment in the amount of $509,521.31. For the reasons set forth below, the Applications are DENIED. (See document for details.). -... (es)
|
|
Filing 16
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (tg)
|
|
Filing 15
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: for Order #12 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): An incorrect event was selected for Document No. 12. The correct event is Request Order. You are not required to take any action in response to this notice unless the Court so directs. (lh)
|
|
Filing 14
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (lh)
|
|
Filing 12
Request for Special Appointment to Serve Process filed by Plaintiff Mordechai Rubin (Attachments: #1 [Proposed] Order)(Harney, Christopher) Modified on 5/22/2020 (lh).
|
|
Filing 11
DECLARATION of Christopher J. Harney in support of EX PARTE APPLICATION for Writ of attachment #7 , EX PARTE APPLICATION for Writ of attachment #6 filed by Plaintiff Mordechai Rubin. (Harney, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 10
DECLARATION of Mordechai Rubin aka Michael Rubin in support of EX PARTE APPLICATION for Writ of attachment #7 , EX PARTE APPLICATION for Writ of attachment #6 filed by Plaintiff Mordechai Rubin. (Harney, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 9
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re EX PARTE APPLICATION for Writ of attachment #7 , EX PARTE APPLICATION for Writ of attachment #6 (in support of) filed by Plaintiff Mordechai Rubin. (Harney, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 8
MEMORANDUM in Support of EX PARTE APPLICATION for Writ of attachment #7 , EX PARTE APPLICATION for Writ of attachment #6 filed by Plaintiff Mordechai Rubin. (Harney, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 7
EX PARTE APPLICATION for Writ of attachment filed by Plaintiff Mordechai Rubin. (Attachments: #1 Application for Right to Attach Order (SCBH Laboratory LLC), #2 Temporary Protective Order (SCBH Laboratory LLC), #3 Writ of Attachment (SCBH Laboratory LLC)) (Harney, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 6
EX PARTE APPLICATION for Writ of attachment filed by Plaintiff Mordechai Rubin. (Attachments: #1 Application for Right to Attach Order (Charles McPhail), #2 Temporary Protective Order (Charles McPhail), #3 Writ of Attachment (Charles McPhail)) (Harney, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 5
EX PARTE APPLICATION for Writ of attachment filed by Plaintiff Mordechai Rubin. (Attachments: #1 Application for Right to Attach Order (Andre McPhail), #2 Temporary Protective Order (Andre McPhail), #3 Writ of Attachment (Andre McPhail), #4 Memorandum, #5 Request for Judicial Notice, #6 Declaration of Mordechai, #7 Declaration of Christopher J. Harney) (Harney, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 4
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Mordechai Rubin. (Harney, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 3
Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Mordechai Rubin, (Harney, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Mordechai Rubin. (Harney, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26527980 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Mordechai Rubin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney Christopher James Harney added to party Mordechai Rubin(pty:pla))(Harney, Christopher)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
