PS Broker, Inc. v. Reda Saleeb, et al
| PS Broker, Inc. |
| Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Reda Saleeb and Eva Saleeb |
| 8:2020cv00968 |
| May 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant All Defendants, identifying Reda Saleeb and Eva Saleeb. (Attorney Carlo Cassasola Ignacio added to party Does(pty:dft))(Ignacio, Carlo) |
| Filing 19 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Answer to Complaint filed by Defendant Reda Saleeb.(Ignacio, Carlo) |
| Filing 18 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Answer to Complaint #15 , #16 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The document is stricken and counsel is ordered to file an amended or corrected document by 7/27/2020. Counsel shall file the Certification and Notice of Interested Parties only, using the correct filing event. (iv) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint #15 , #16 . The following error(s) was/were found: Answers appear to duplicate of previously filed Answers Dkt. 11 and 12. Certification and Notice of Interested Parties should have been filed as separate documents and not as attachments to the Answer. Civil Events- Other Filings- Notices- Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (iv) |
| Filing 16 **STRICKEN** ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Answer to Complaint filed by Defendant Reda Saleeb. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Interested Parties)(Ignacio, Carlo) Modified on 7/21/2020 Per Response #18 (iv). |
| Filing 15 **STRICKEN** ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Answer to Complaint filed by Defendant Eva Saleeb. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Interested Parties)(Ignacio, Carlo) Modified on 7/21/2020 Per Response #18 (iv). |
| Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint #11 , #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. (iv) |
Filing 13
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This case has been assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. This matter is set for a scheduling conference 08/10/20 at 11:00 AM. (pg)
|
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Eva Saleeb. (Attachments: #1 Proof of service)(Attorney Carlo Cassasola Ignacio added to party Eva Saleeb(pty:dft))(Ignacio, Carlo) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Reda Saleeb. (Attachments: #1 proof of service)(Attorney Carlo Cassasola Ignacio added to party Reda Saleeb(pty:dft))(Ignacio, Carlo) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. In response to this Order to Show Cause, the Court will accept the following no later than JULY 17, 2020. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause by JULY 17, 2020 will result in the dismissal of this action. See minute order for details. (lom)
|
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff PS Broker, Inc., upon Defendant Eva Saleeb served on 6/2/2020, answer due 6/23/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Eva Saleeb, dft in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. Attorney for Plaintiff (Hesse, Michael) |
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff PS Broker, Inc., upon Defendant Reda Saleeb served on 6/2/2020, answer due 6/23/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Reda Saleeb, dft in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. Attorney for Plaintiff (Hesse, Michael) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants Eva Saleeb, Reda Saleeb. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (esa) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff PS BROKER, INC.. (Hesse, Michael) |
| Filing 3 Notice and CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff PS BROKER, INC., (Hesse, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff PS BROKER, INC.. (Hesse, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by plaintiff PS BROKER, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits 1 to 4) (Attorney Michael Vaughn Hesse added to party PS BROKER, INC.(pty:pla))(Hesse, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
