Nadia Paloma Pearson v. Scott C. Stiles et al
| Nadia Paloma Pearson |
| Steven R. Jones, City of Garden Grove, Scott C. Stiles and Tom DaRe |
| 8:2020cv01038 |
| June 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen E Scott |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 REQUEST to Dismiss Case against all Defendants with prejudice filed by NADIA PALOMA PEARSON Nadia Paloma Pearson. (Pearson, John) |
| Filing 6 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (tg) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (esa) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Nadia Paloma Pearson. (Pearson, John) |
| Filing 2 * CIVIL COVER SHEET * filed as COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid (400.00 paid on 06/09/2020, receipt number 26740872), filed by Plaintiff Nadia Paloma Pearson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Attachment to CV71)(Pearson, John) Modified on 6/9/2020 (esa). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26740872 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Nadia Paloma Pearson. (Attorney John J Pearson added to party Nadia Paloma Pearson(pty:pla))(Pearson, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
