T-Max (Hangzhou) Technology Co., Ltd. v. Lund Motion Products, Inc. et al
| T-Max (Hangzhou) Technology Co., Ltd. |
| Truck Hero, Inc. and Lund Motion Products, Inc. |
| 8:2020cv01058 |
| June 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen E Scott |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (tg) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (esa) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by T-MAX (HANGZHOU) TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. (Schnurer, John) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff T-MAX (HANGZHOU) TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD, (Schnurer, John) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff T-MAX (HANGZHOU) TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. (Schnurer, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26788415 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff T-MAX (HANGZHOU) TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (Attorney John P Schnurer added to party T-MAX (HANGZHOU) TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD(pty:pla))(Schnurer, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
