Jackline Muthoka v. National Board of Medical Examiners
Plaintiff: Jackline Muthoka
Defendant: National Board of Medical Examiners
Case Number: 8:2020cv01072
Filed: June 15, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Karen E Scott
Referring Judge: Josephine L Staton
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION on Stipulation to Dismiss With Prejudice by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court, having been advised that this action has been resolved by a Stipulation of Dismissal #21 , hereby Orders this action dismissed with prejudice. The Court hereby orders all proceedings in the case vacated and taken off calendar. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
August 5, 2020 Filing 21 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiff Jackline Muthoka. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Jambeck, Jay)
July 30, 2020 Filing 20 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Caroline Mew. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jp)
July 30, 2020 Filing 19 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Robert A Burgoyne. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jp)
July 28, 2020 Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant National Board of Medical Examiners, re Corporate Disclosure Statement #16 , Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #15 served on July 27, 2020. (Burgin, Alisha)
July 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Scheduling Conference is set for 9/18/2020 at 10:30 a.m. See attached Order for details. (tg)
July 27, 2020 Filing 16 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by Defendant National Board of Medical Examiners identifying (No Parent Corporation) as Corporate Parent. (Burgin, Alisha)
July 27, 2020 Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 DEFENDANT'S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF filed by Defendant National Board of Medical Examiners.(Attorney Alisha C Burgin added to party National Board of Medical Examiners(pty:dft))(Burgin, Alisha)
July 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue (Doc. #9 ) by Judge Josephine L. Staton: Plaintiff has completely failed to (1) attempt to serve Defendant with, or notify Defendant of, her Ex Parte Application, or (2) offer any explanation as to why notice to Defendant should not be required in this instance. Those failures require that her Application be DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff may re-file her Application after complying with all requirements set forth above. Any renewed Application must include a declaration from Plaintiff's counsel attesting to such compliance. (jp)
July 16, 2020 Filing 13 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to To Provide Extended Testing Time on USMLE #9 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Jambeck, Jay)
July 16, 2020 Filing 12 DECLARATION of Jay T. Jambeck in support of EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to To Provide Extended Testing Time on USMLE #9 filed by Plaintiff Jackline Muthoka. (Jambeck, Jay)
July 16, 2020 Filing 11 DECLARATION of Jackline Muthoka in support of EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to To Provide Extended Testing Time on USMLE #9 filed by Plaintiff Jackline Muthoka. (Jambeck, Jay)
July 16, 2020 Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Support of EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to To Provide Extended Testing Time on USMLE #9 filed by Plaintiff Jackline Muthoka. (Jambeck, Jay)
July 16, 2020 Filing 9 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to To Provide Extended Testing Time on USMLE filed by Plaintiff Jackline Muthoka. (Jambeck, Jay)
June 17, 2020 Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (tg)
June 17, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (et)
June 17, 2020 Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant National Board of Medical Examiners. (et)
June 17, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
June 17, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (et)
June 15, 2020 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Jackline Muthoka. (Jambeck, Jay)
June 15, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jackline Muthoka. (Jambeck, Jay)
June 15, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26814194 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Jackline Muthoka. (Attorney Jay T Jambeck added to party Jackline Muthoka(pty:pla))(Jambeck, Jay)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackline Muthoka v. National Board of Medical Examiners
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jackline Muthoka
Represented By: Jay T Jambeck
Represented By: Damien Berkes Troutman
Represented By: Mandy G Leigh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Board of Medical Examiners
Represented By: Alisha C Burgin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?