Caroline Marie De Laurell v. Ford Motor Credit Company LLC et al
| Caroline Marie De Laurell |
| Ford Motor Credit Company LLC and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive |
| 8:2020cv01103 |
| June 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John D Early |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to September 10, 2020 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Credit Company LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Yosef, Daniel) |
| Filing 13 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney David Allan Berkley counsel for Defendant Ford Motor Credit Company LLC. Adding David A. Berkley as counsel of record for Ford Motor Credit Company LLC for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Ford Motor Credit Company LLC. (Berkley, David) |
| Filing 12 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Scott J Hyman counsel for Defendant Ford Motor Credit Company LLC. Adding Scott J. Hyman as counsel of record for Ford Motor Credit Company LLC for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Ford Motor Credit Company LLC. (Hyman, Scott) |
| Filing 11 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Credit Company LLC, (Yosef, Daniel) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Ford Motor Credit Company LLC answer now due 8/26/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Credit Company LLC.(Attorney Daniel E Yosef added to party Ford Motor Credit Company LLC(pty:dft))(Yosef, Daniel) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Caroline Marie De Laurell, upon Defendant Ford Motor Credit Company LLC served on 7/6/2020, answer due 7/27/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Peter Cayetano, Intake Specialist for CT Corporation System, Registered Agent for Ford Motor Credit Company LLC in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Jones, Michael) |
| Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (tg) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Ford Motor Credit Company LLC. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Caroline Marie De Laurell. (Jones, Michael) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Caroline Marie De Laurell, identifying the litigants as the only interested parties. (Jones, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Caroline Marie De Laurell. (Jones, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26944165 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Caroline Marie De Laurell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EXHIBIT A - TCPA Rosenthal Creditor notice) (Attorney Michael Anthony Jones added to party Caroline Marie De Laurell(pty:pla))(Jones, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
