Chris Langer v. Janet Riedman et al
Plaintiff: Chris Langer
Defendant: Janet Riedman and Does 1-10
Case Number: 8:2020cv01120
Filed: June 25, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Southern Division - Santa Ana Office
Presiding Judge: Autumn D Spaeth
Referring Judge: Josephine L Staton
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER GRANTING Stipulation to Extend Time to File Responsive Pleading to Complaint #16 by Judge Josephine L. Staton that defendants in this case may respond to the complaint is extended to 8/27/2020. (jp)
July 28, 2020 Filing 16 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Janet Riedman answer now due 8/27/2020, filed by Defendant Janet Riedman. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Lodging of Proposed Order, #2 Proposed Order)(Attorney Heather A Tovar added to party Janet Riedman(pty:dft))(Tovar, Heather)
July 12, 2020 Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Chris Langer, upon Defendant Janet Riedman served on 7/6/2020, answer due 7/27/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell)
July 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DECLINING Supplemental Jurisdiction and DISMISSING State-Law Claim Without Prejudice by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim, and the claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to filing in state court. (jp)
July 3, 2020 Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Chris Langerto Order to Show Cause, #11 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration Russell Handy, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2)(Handy, Russell)
July 1, 2020 Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Chris Langer, (Handy, Russell)
June 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION by Judge Josephine L. Staton: Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause, in writing, no later than ten (10) days from the date of this Order, why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act and California Disabled Persons Act claims. (See document for further information). (jp)
June 26, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 . The following error(s) was found: The caption on the document uploaded to the docket entry number referenced above does not match the case information on the docket (e.g., case title, case number, document name, etc.). The Court may 1)order an amended or corrected document to be filed, 2)order the document stricken, or 3)take other action the Court deems appropriate. You may file a Notice of Errata attaching a corrected version of the document, but you are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. 2) No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (lh)
June 26, 2020 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Janet Riedman. (lh)
June 26, 2020 Filing 8 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (tg)
June 26, 2020 Filing 7 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (tg)
June 26, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
June 26, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (lh)
June 25, 2020 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Chris Langer. (Handy, Russell)
June 25, 2020 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Chris Langer, (Handy, Russell)
June 25, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Chris Langer. (Handy, Russell)
June 25, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26966298 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Chris Langer. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Chris Langer(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chris Langer v. Janet Riedman et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Janet Riedman
Represented By: Heather A Tovar
Represented By: Douglas B Vanderpool
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chris Langer
Represented By: Amanda Lockhart Seabock
Represented By: Raymond George Ballister, Jr
Represented By: Dennis Jay Price, II
Represented By: Russell C Handy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?