Jaime E. Berry et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
Ryan Crane, Jaime E. Berry and R. C. |
UnitedHealth Insurance Company, Plan Administrator Boston Scientific Corporation, Boston Scientific Corporation, Unitedhealthcare Insurance Company and Does 1-5, inclusive |
8:2020cv01166 |
June 30, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Cormac J Carney |
Karen E Scott |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 PETITION for Appointment of Jaime E. Berry as Guardian ad Litem for R.C. filed by Plaintiff Jaime E. Berry. (Blakeman, Benjamin) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Jaime E. Berry. (Blakeman, Benjamin) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jaime E. Berry, (Blakeman, Benjamin) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jaime E. Berry. (Blakeman, Benjamin) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27017515 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Jaime E. Berry. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Computer Record, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Text Message Screenshot, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - Screenshot of Website, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D - Claim Denial Letter, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E - Appeal Letter, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F - Appeal Denial Letter) (Attorney Benjamin Blakeman added to party Jaime E. Berry(pty:pla))(Blakeman, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.