Caroline Gibson et al v. County of Orange et al
| 8:2020cv01232 |
| July 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER RE STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION OF PLAINTIFF CAROLINE GIBSON PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(1)(A)(i) WITH PREJUDICE by Judge James V. Selna, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the above entitled action of Plaintiff CAROLINE GIBSON and all claims and parti es therein, against all Defendants is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each party shall bear their own costs and fees. re Stipulation to Dismiss 41 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (es)
|
|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS 16 by Judge John W. Holcomb 16 For the reasons discussed above, the Court will enter an Order GRANTING the Motion and DISMISSING the entirety of the Complaint, with leave to amend in part. In view of that ruling, the Court need not reach Defendants arguments regarding joinder. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See document for further details) (yl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Caroline Gibson et al v. County of Orange et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
