Dan Deforest v. Travel Transparency of Arizona, LLC et al
Dan Deforest |
Does 1 through 10, inclusive, and each of them,, Travel Transparency of Arizona, LLC, Travel Transparency, LLC, Derek Gough, Diversified Global Ventures, Inc. and Greg Cummings & Associates |
8:2020cv01321 |
July 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Cormac J Carney |
Karen E Scott |
Other Statutory Actions |
47 U.S.C. § 0227 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A) #15 , Notice of Voluntary Dismissal #14 by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The document is STRICKEN for the reasons indicated on the Notice to Filer of Deficiencies #15 issued on 8/27/2020. (hr) |
Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Party(ies) (Pursuant to FRCP 41a(1)) #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Page 2 of the notice reads: to defendant STEPHENS MATTHEWS MARKETING, INC. only. This is not a defendant in this case. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (twdb) |
Filing 14 **STRICKEN PER DOCKET NO. #16 ** NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff Dan Deforest pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to Greg Cummings & Associates. (Friedman, Todd) Modified on 8/31/2020 (hr). |
Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint/Petition, #8 as to defendant Derek Gough. (twdb) |
Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint/Petition, #8 as to defendant Greg Cummings & Associates. (twdb) |
Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint/Petition, #8 as to defendant Diversified Global Ventures, Inc. (twdb) |
Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint/Petition, #8 as to defendant Travel Transparency, LLC. (twdb) |
Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition, #8 filed by Plaintiff Dan Deforest. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Summons #2, #2 Supplement Summons #3, #3 Supplement Summons #4)(Friedman, Todd) |
Filing 8 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Does, Travel Transparency, LLC, Diversified Global Ventures, Inc., Greg Cummings & Associates, Derek Gough amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Dan Deforest(Friedman, Todd) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Travel Transparency of Arizona, LLC. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (et) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Dan Deforest, identifying Travel Transparency of Arizona, LLC. (Friedman, Todd) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Dan Deforest. (Friedman, Todd) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Dan Deforest. (Friedman, Todd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27311810 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Dan Deforest. (Attorney Todd M Friedman added to party Dan Deforest(pty:pla))(Friedman, Todd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.