James Rutherford v. Quartz Hill, LLC et al
| James Rutherford |
| Quartz Hill, LLC and Does 1-10, inclusive |
| 8:2020cv01400 |
| July 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Karen E Scott |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
CIVIL TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER [FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)] by Judge Percy Anderson. (Discovery cut-off 3/8/2021. Setting Motion Cut-off date of 3/15/2021. Bench Trial set for 5/18/2021 at 09:00 AM before Judge Percy Anderson. Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/16/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge Percy Anderson.) (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 20
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Percy Anderson. The Court has received the parties' joint 26(f) report and finds that a scheduling conference is not necessary. Dates set by the Court in this action are listed in the "Schedule of Trial and Pretrial Dates" attached to this order. (Last Day for Hearing on Motion to Amend Pleadings or Add Parties 1/25/2021. Discovery cut-off 3/8/2021. Exhibit List due by 4/2/2021. Witness List due by 4/2/2021. Last Day for Hearing Motions 3/15/2021. Motions in Limine to be filed by 4/16/2021. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 4/2/2021. Status Report due by 4/2/2021. Last date to conduct settlement conference is 3/22/2021. Bench Trial set for 5/18/2021 at 09:00 AM before Judge Percy Anderson. Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/16/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge Percy Anderson.) The scheduling conference currently on calendar for October 26, 2020, 2020, at 10:30 a.m. is hereby vacated, and the matter taken off calendar. (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 2 by Judge Percy Anderson. Case ordered to Court Mediation Panel for mediation. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than March 22, 2021. (mrgo)
|
| Filing 18 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford.. (Manning, Joseph) |
|
Filing 17
SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)] ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. (Scheduling Conference set for 10/26/2020 at 10:30 AM before Judge Percy Anderson.) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Quartz Hill, LLC, identifying Robert Assil. (Weiss, Thomas) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Quartz Hill, LLC Quartz Hill, LLC.(Attorney Thomas J Weiss added to party Quartz Hill, LLC(pty:dft))(Weiss, Thomas) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Quartz Hill, LLC served on 8/16/2020, answer due 9/8/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
|
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. The Court has reviewed the Response filed by plaintiff and plaintiff's counsel to the Court's Order to Show Cause. For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's Unruh Act and any other construction-related accessibility claim. The Court therefore dismisses any such claims without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. 1367(c)(4). (See document for full details) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff James Rutherfordto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,,, #11 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of JRM, #2 Declaration of Rutherford)(Manning, Joseph) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Percy Anderson.. The Complaint filed in this action asserts a claim for injunctive relief arising out of and alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. 12010-12213, and a claim for damages pursuant to California's Unruh Civil Rights Act ("Unruh Act"), Cal. Civ. Code 51-53. It appears that the Court possesses only supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim, and any other state law claim that plaintiff may have alleged, pursuant to the Court's supplemental jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. 1367(a). Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than August 14, 2020. (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (See document for details) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (tj) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Quartz Hill, LLC. (lh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to counsel re consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Southern Division Blackout Case. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual, (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27427700 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual(pty:pla))(Manning, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
