Martin Huizar Quesada v. Albertson's LLC, et al
| Martin Huizar Quesada |
| Does 1 through 20, inclusive and Albertson's LLC |
| 8:2020cv01407 |
| July 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 CIVIL TRIAL ORDER for cases assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton. (mku) |
Filing 14
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 2 by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Case ordered to Court Mediation Panel for mediation. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than October 1, 2021. (mku)
|
|
Filing 13
MINUTES (In Chambers) SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Josephine L. Staton: On the Court's own motion, the Scheduling Conference set for hearing 9/25/2020, is VACATED and the following schedule is set. Final Pretrial Conference set for 12/3/2021 at 10:30 AM. (See document for further information) (jp)
|
| Filing 12 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 7-10 days, filed by Defendant Albertson's LLC.. (White, Leigh) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Martin Huizar Quesada, identifying Martin Huizar Quesada and Albertson's, LLC.. (Nalbandyan, Akop) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Albertson's LLC, served on 8/11/20. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(White, Leigh) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Scheduling Conference set for 9/25/2020 at 10:30 a.m. See Order for details. (mku)
|
| Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (mku) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Douglas F. McCormick. New Case Number 8:20-cv-01407 JLS (DFMx). (esa) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Albertson's LLC, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on 7/30/20. (White, Leigh) |
| Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Albertson's LLC, identifying Albertsns Company Inc.. (White, Leigh) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Albertson's LLC. (White, Leigh) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County, case number 30-2020-01144801 Receipt No: ACACDC-27426162 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Albertson's LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons & Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Plaintiff's Civil Case Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit C - Defendant's Answer to Complaint) (Attorney Leigh A White added to party Albertson's LLC(pty:dft))(White, Leigh) |
| COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by defendant Albertson's LLC. (non-conformed, submitted as document 1, attachment 3)(esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Albertson's LLC, Does, Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Martin Huizar Quesada. (filed in state court 5/26/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
