James Rutherford v. Allied Tax Group LLC et al
| James Rutherford |
| Seilabi Acquisition Group II, LLC, Does 1-10, inclusive and Allied Tax Group LLC |
| 8:2020cv01429 |
| August 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 4-5 days, filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford.. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 22 AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Allied Tax Group LLC, Does, Seilabi Acquisition Group II, LLC. (Gladych, John) |
| Filing 21 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants All Defendants, identifying Allied Tax Group, LLC & Seilabi Acquisition Group II, LLC. (Attorney John Anthony Gladych added to party Seilabi Acquisition Group II, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney John Anthony Gladych added to party Does(pty:dft))(Gladych, John) |
| Filing 20 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Answer #17 by Judge Josephine L. Staton. In accordance with the Notice to Filer of Deficiencies In Electronically Filed Documents, it is hereby ORDERED that the document is accepted as filed. However, counsel must consult the Notice to Filer of Deficiencies #19 and file a Notice of Interested Parties no later than **September 14, 2020.** Failure to do so may result in the Answer being STRICKEN. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 19 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint filed by Defendant Allied Tax Group LLC #17 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1)No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. (2) Counsel must comply with Local Rule 7.1-1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp) |
Filing 18
ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Scheduling Conference set for 11/6/2020 at 10:30 a.m. See Order for details. (mku)
|
| Filing 17 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND Allied Tax Group, LLC and Seilabi Acquisition Group II, LLC's Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant Allied Tax Group LLC.(Attorney John Anthony Gladych added to party Allied Tax Group LLC(pty:dft))(Gladych, John) |
| Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Seilabi Acquisition Group II, LLC served on 8/23/2020, answer due 9/14/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Allied Tax Group LLC served on 8/12/2020, answer due 9/2/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hashemi, Babak) |
|
Filing 14
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DECLINING SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION AND DISMISSING STATE-LAW CLAIM WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Josephine L. Staton: For the foregoing reasons, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim, and the claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to filing in state court. (bm)
|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff James Rutherfordto Order to Show Cause, #10 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Babak Hashemi, #2 Declaration of Plaintiff)(Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 12 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (mku) |
| Filing 11 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (mku) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION by Judge Josephine L. Staton: Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause, in writing, no later than ten (10) days from the date of this Order, why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim. (See document for further information). (jp)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Allied Tax Group LLC. (car) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Seilabi Acquisition Group II, LLC. (car) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (car) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff James Rutherford, (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27482781 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Attorney Babak Hashemi added to party James Rutherford(pty:pla))(Hashemi, Babak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
